2012
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-5-277-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of SpacePy's radial diffusion radiation belt model

Abstract: Abstract. Model verification, or the process of ensuring that the prescribed equations are properly solved, is a necessary step in code development. Careful, quantitative verification guides users when selecting grid resolution and time step and gives confidence to code developers that existing code is properly instituted. This work introduces the RadBelt radiation belt model, a new, open-source version of the Dynamic Radiation Environment Assimilation Model (DREAM) and uses the Method of Manufactured Solution… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of this tool in the radiation belt has been demonstrated by Koller et al (2007) to understand the acceleration mechanisms missing from the 1-D radiation belt model but being accounted for by the assimilation technique. (A version of EnKF and the radial diffusion radiation model are available with SpacePy (Morley et al, 2010;Welling et al, 2012).) Schiller et al (2012) conducted a parametric study using the EnKF innovation vector to identify the source location and magnitude in the outer electron radiation belt.…”
Section: Y Yu Et Al: Radiation Belt Data Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of this tool in the radiation belt has been demonstrated by Koller et al (2007) to understand the acceleration mechanisms missing from the 1-D radiation belt model but being accounted for by the assimilation technique. (A version of EnKF and the radial diffusion radiation model are available with SpacePy (Morley et al, 2010;Welling et al, 2012).) Schiller et al (2012) conducted a parametric study using the EnKF innovation vector to identify the source location and magnitude in the outer electron radiation belt.…”
Section: Y Yu Et Al: Radiation Belt Data Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational grid is of dimension n = 90 for the model domain 1 < L * < 10. The Crank‐Nicolson scheme is an implicit, unconditionally stable numerical method, which converges with any reasonable time step Δ t [ Welling et al , 2011]. The inner boundary condition at L * = 1 is fixed at zero, and the outer boundary condition is modeled with a strong loss term (timescale of a drift period) for L * > L max , the last closed drift shell.…”
Section: Radiation Belt Model and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They attributed these unnatural features to inaccuracies in the calculations of the second invariant K. As a complement to this earlier work, we will show below that such differences are also induced by the calculation of the first adiabatic invariant from a given (E, 0 , L * ) according to the magnetic field model in use. The maximum available L * corresponding to the last closed drift-shell is calculated following the simple empirical estimation of Welling et al (2012) that gives L * max = 6.07 × 10 −5 Dst 2 + 0.0436 Dst + 9.37. In this case the initial and boundary conditions drive the model and are derived from the edges of the plots in Figure 2.…”
Section: Psd: Role Of the Magnetic Field On Psd Peaks 421 Explanatmentioning
confidence: 99%