2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.01.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of the mathematical model of the screen blocking process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a significant difference in the results obtained. In case of the vibrating feeder, the forces acting on the fruit are much higher than those acting on the feeder with reciprocating motion [35,36]. In the first case, the average force acting on the fruit after time was 17.4 mN, whereas in case of the reciprocating feeder 11.6 mN, which means that the average value of this force is about 30% lower in comparison with the vibrating feeder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a significant difference in the results obtained. In case of the vibrating feeder, the forces acting on the fruit are much higher than those acting on the feeder with reciprocating motion [35,36]. In the first case, the average force acting on the fruit after time was 17.4 mN, whereas in case of the reciprocating feeder 11.6 mN, which means that the average value of this force is about 30% lower in comparison with the vibrating feeder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a low concentration of the agent does not affect the rheological properties of the liquid. After the proper moisture content was reached, granules were screened using sieves, in order to separate the size fractions [30,31]. .…”
Section: The Test Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors that depend on the design of the equipment used belong to a second group, and includes the shape and size of the screen openings [5,8,11,12,20,26,27], type and material [5,8], screen inclination angle [2,4,6,11,14,21,26,27], vibration mode (linear, circular, elliptical) [2,7], direction [4,6,14,19,22], vibration amplitude [2,11,14,19,21,27] and frequency [2,4,6,11,14,19,22,27]. The third group includes factors that characterise the sieving/screening process itself, such as mass flow (in the case of a continuous process) or the amount of material fed in (in the case of a batch process) [5,8,11,12,20,22], sieving duration [1,3,16] ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%