2005
DOI: 10.3319/tao.2005.16.5.1045(t)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of the Suspected Ta-chia-tung Fault by Ground Penetrating Radar and Resistivity Image Profiling Methods

Abstract: Ground penetration radar imaging reveals a prominent reflector which is offset vertically by about 2.6 m at depth about 2.3 m across the scarp. Schlumberger depth sounding exhibits a disrupted marker that links the loci of maximum apparent resistivity at greater depths.Resistivity image profiling (RIP) surveys across the scarp yield either zones of low resistivity (two profiles) or disruption of high resistivity zones (one profile); those anomalies are suggestive of a low angle thrust fault.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two-dimensional (2D) surface-based resistivity surveys have been used widely in different shallow subsurface explorations (e.g., Daily et al 1992;Yang et al 2002;Yang et al 2005;Cassiani et al 2006;Cheng et al 2008 ). In some cases, the 2D sections have been combined to form reasonably accurate images of three-dimensional (3D) structures (e.g., Bernstone et al 1997;Dahlin and Loke 1997); however, 3D techniques (Loke and Barker 1996;Slater et al 2002) for resistivity surveys may have to be considered if one has to illustrate detailed subsurface structures in a strongly heterogeneous environment (Dahlin et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two-dimensional (2D) surface-based resistivity surveys have been used widely in different shallow subsurface explorations (e.g., Daily et al 1992;Yang et al 2002;Yang et al 2005;Cassiani et al 2006;Cheng et al 2008 ). In some cases, the 2D sections have been combined to form reasonably accurate images of three-dimensional (3D) structures (e.g., Bernstone et al 1997;Dahlin and Loke 1997); however, 3D techniques (Loke and Barker 1996;Slater et al 2002) for resistivity surveys may have to be considered if one has to illustrate detailed subsurface structures in a strongly heterogeneous environment (Dahlin et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self-healing of fractures filled with mud-fluids causes the mud fluid conduits to vary from time to time and makes it difficult to observe the connection of the fracture systems at the surface. In this particular area, we first conducted 2D resistivity imaging surveys between 2005and 2007(Chang et al 2010 for monitoring the variation of the resistivity structures. From the results of 2D surveys, we learned that the fractures filled with mud fluids are very conductive 3D objects compared to the surrounding saturated mudstone and that their orientations may not be imaged correctly in 2D surveys owing to the shadow effect (e.g., Nimmer et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%