2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cps.2016.0042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification using counterexample fragment based specification relaxation: case of modular/concurrent linear hybrid automata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[31][32][33]). Specification relaxation is another stream to ease the specification elaboration to benefit from counterexample, for example, [34] as a recent approach.…”
Section: Formal Languages Used In Formal Verification Of Aps Control ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33]). Specification relaxation is another stream to ease the specification elaboration to benefit from counterexample, for example, [34] as a recent approach.…”
Section: Formal Languages Used In Formal Verification Of Aps Control ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model updating and model mapping are essentially model-driven system transformation processes [20]. The updating is to adjust the model on the existing structure, and the mapping is to change the model from one structure to another conserving the bidirectional conversion capability [21].…”
Section: Formal Definitions and Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doyen et al 40 presented three complementary analysis approaches based on symbolic representations, abstraction, and logic to enable the verification of general temporal logic specifications. Ren et al 41 proposed a symbolic verifier for the safety verification of concurrent linear hybrid automation, which was illustrated through an application to the Fischer mutual exclusion protocol.…”
Section: Applications Of Hybrid Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%