2015
DOI: 10.1080/10586458.2015.1029599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verified Computations for Hyperbolic 3-Manifolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Task (1) was fulfilled via find exceptional fillings.py, a python script written by the author already used in [35] and publicly available [33] to be performed on any cusped hyperbolic three-manifold. The computer-assisted proof is rigorous thanks to the hikmot libraries [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task (1) was fulfilled via find exceptional fillings.py, a python script written by the author already used in [35] and publicly available [33] to be performed on any cusped hyperbolic three-manifold. The computer-assisted proof is rigorous thanks to the hikmot libraries [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We give the details for N the complement of the knot 10 153 ; the calculations for 10 152 and 10 154 follow along the same lines. The package HIKMOT [17] certifies that the interior of N admits a finite volume hyperbolic metric. Now SnapPy [10] gives the following presentation for the fundamental group of N :…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining Theorem 1.1 with the "no false positives" results of Moser [29] and Hoffman et al [22], and by running the latter authors' software HIKMOT over the non-orientable 8-tetrahedron census (which neither paper [22,29] examines), we can finally show that the SnapPea census meets its original aim: Corollary 1.2. The Callahan-Hildebrand-Thistlethwaite-Weeks census tables exactly represent all cusped finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifolds that can be constructed from n ≤ 8 ideal tetrahedra, with no intruders (false positives) and no omissions (false negatives).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This possibility can now be eliminated using the techniques of Moser [29] and Hoffman et al [22], who use numerical methods to show that SnapPea's approximate geometric structure is indeed an approximation to an exact geometric structure. In particular, Moser has shown that the n ≤ 7-tetrahedron census contains no false positives, and Hoffman et al have shown that the orientable n ≤ 8-tetrahedron census contains no false positives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation