Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science
DOI: 10.1109/sfcs.1996.548520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verifying identities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, [RaS96] show that quadratic time is necessary and sufficient to test that a given cancellative operation is associative. This method yields a very efficient tester (over small domains) for all functions satisfying associative functional equations [Acz66].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, [RaS96] show that quadratic time is necessary and sufficient to test that a given cancellative operation is associative. This method yields a very efficient tester (over small domains) for all functions satisfying associative functional equations [Acz66].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In this extended abstract we show the checker under the assumption that the input operation is cancellative and leave the general case for the full version of the paper. In contrast, [RaS96] show that quadratic time is necessary and sufficient to test that a given cancellative operation is associative. This method yields a very efficient tester (over small domains) for all functions satisfying associative functional equations [Acz66].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before we finish, let us clarify an important difference between our work and the work on testing properties of relations, on group isomorphism, etc (see for example [5,13,15,20,26,28]). In that case the input is a multiplication table, of size O(|G| 2 ), while in our case we usually assume that k = O(log |G|).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given an n × n table of a binary operation • acting on a set S, deterministic and randomized algorithms have been given for testing if • represents an associative operation [21], if • is close to being associative and commutative [11], or if • is close to being cancellative, associative and commutative. Similarly, given a group G in the form of a multiplication table, we could ask if G is a special group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%