2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59250-3_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verifying Integer Programming Results

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We see an increase in solving time of 56.3% on fpeasy, 22% on numdiff, and of 46% on miplib. This confirms the measurements presented in [13]. The increase is explained mostly by the effort to keep track of the disjunctions created during tree search and print the exact dual multipliers, and in part by an increase in dual bounding time.…”
Section: Producing and Verifying Certificatessupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We see an increase in solving time of 56.3% on fpeasy, 22% on numdiff, and of 46% on miplib. This confirms the measurements presented in [13]. The increase is explained mostly by the effort to keep track of the disjunctions created during tree search and print the exact dual multipliers, and in part by an increase in dual bounding time.…”
Section: Producing and Verifying Certificatessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Here, we consider running times for both the solver and the certificate checker, as well as the overhead in the safe dual bounding methods introduced through enabling certificates. This provides an update for the analysis in [13], which was limited to the two bounding methods project-and-shift and exact LP.…”
Section: Computational Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, we integrate the exact LP solver SoPlex, which follows the recently developed scheme of LP iterative refinement [23], we extend the logging of certificates in the recently developed VIPR format to all available dual bounding methods [13], and produce a thoroughly revised implementation of the original framework [16], which improves multiple technical details. Our computational study evaluates the performance of the new algorithmic aspects in detail and indicates a significant overall speedup compared to the original framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%