2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0271-5309(00)00011-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verifying the primacy of voice fundamental frequency in social status accommodation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such invariance could account for a convergence in fundamental frequency between speakers during conversation, as reported by Gregory et al (2000). Although a number of studies have focused on pitch variables, in particular fundamental frequency (Scherer, 1986;Tolkmitt and Scherer, 1986;Murray and Arnolt 1993), little is known about the role of voice quality in communicating affection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such invariance could account for a convergence in fundamental frequency between speakers during conversation, as reported by Gregory et al (2000). Although a number of studies have focused on pitch variables, in particular fundamental frequency (Scherer, 1986;Tolkmitt and Scherer, 1986;Murray and Arnolt 1993), little is known about the role of voice quality in communicating affection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…After the experiment had been explained and written informed consent obtained, participants were shown the twelve target videos, played without sound to avoid possible effects of pitch convergence (Gregory, Green, Carrothers, Dagan, & Webster, 2001), and asked to record a response message to each one. Participants were told that these messages would be presented to opposite-sex participants who would judge them as a potential date: in the case of responses to opposite-sex targets, participants believed their messages were going to be presented to the target they were responding to (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of phonetic features have been reported to undergo imitative convergence, such as accent, speaking rate, intensity, pitch, variation of frequency bands, long-term average spectra, frequency of pauses, and utterance length (Giles et al 1991;Goldinger 1997;Gregory 1990;Gregory and Webster 1996;Gregory et al 1993Gregory et al , 1997Gregory et al , 2001Namy et al 2002;Natale 1975;Pardo et al 2012). Other studies have concentrated on VOT as a temporal parameter that undergoes assimilation as a result of exposure to the model talker.…”
Section: Imitation In Speechmentioning
confidence: 99%