Verletzungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen

Arbogast, Martin; Haas, Johannes‐Peter

doi:10.1007/s00113-020-00818-2

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In recent years, incisional repositioning elastic nail combined with plate internal fixation has gradually become the most common method of internal fixation for the treatment of double fractures of the distal radial and ulnar segments in children. However, children often refuse to move because of the painful postoperative wound stimulation, which, together with prolonged braking of the affected elbow, leads to stagnation of blood stasis in the affected limb, blockage of qi and blood, loss of nourishment of tendons and bones, joint contracture and adhesions, and various combined factors that eventually lead to stiffness and limited movement of the elbow joint ( 17 , 18 ). Manual repositioning has the characteristics of being less painful and less likely to cause joint damage, the time spent with external fixation after good repositioning is shorter, and the child's forearm function recovers quickly, which is one of the traditional treatment methods commonly used in clinical practice ( 19 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical observation on the treatment of displaced distal radial and ulnar fractures in children by closed manipulation combined with splinting

Wang,

Huo,

et al. 2023

Front. Surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of closed manipulation combined with splinting in the treatment of displaced distal radial and ulnar fractures in children.MethodsA total of 82 children with displaced fractures of the distal radial and ulnar segment who met the inclusion criteria and were treated as outpatients or inpatients in the orthopedic department of Guangzhou Orthopedic Hospital, from January 2016 to June 2022 were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group: 41 children in the observation group were treated with closed manipulation combined with splint fixation; 41 children in the control group were fixed with incisional repositioning elastic nails combined with internal plates. The Anderson efficacy grading, visual analog scale (VAS) score, fracture healing time, treatment cost, hospital days, and complications were observed and compared between the two groups.ResultThe efficacy was evaluated according to the Anderson forearm fracture efficacy evaluation criteria, and the results of statistical analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 3 and 7 weeks after treatment, the VAS scores of children in both groups decreased (P < 0.05), and the VAS scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05), indicating that the observation group had a significant advantage in the relief of pain after treatment. The fractures healed in both groups after treatment with the two different methods, and the difference in healing time between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The length of hospital stay, treatment cost, and complication ratio were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05).ConclusionIn children with displaced fractures of the distal radial and ulnar segments, treatment by manual repositioning with external splinting can achieve satisfactory results with simple operation, low cost, short hospital stay, and few complications, which is especially suitable to be promoted in primary hospitals and has good social benefits.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%