2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-10261-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vernetzte Kompetenzen statt trägen Wissens – Ein Studienmodell zur konsequenten Vernetzung von Fachwissenschaft, Fachdidaktik und Schulpraxis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All courses comprise reflective elements on the methods and the epistemology of mathematics as a discipline, for example, the role of proof on different levels of rigor, experimentation in mathematics, etc. (Barzel et al, in press). Therefore we expect to find relevant growth in competence areas that address the level of reflection on mathematical processes and meta-mathematical issues.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All courses comprise reflective elements on the methods and the epistemology of mathematics as a discipline, for example, the role of proof on different levels of rigor, experimentation in mathematics, etc. (Barzel et al, in press). Therefore we expect to find relevant growth in competence areas that address the level of reflection on mathematical processes and meta-mathematical issues.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Against this backdrop, several attempts to improve university teacher education in German speaking countries have been realised in the past years. As a part of this objective, many projects have aimed to strengthen the links between the study components subject matter and subject matter didactics in different subjects and with individual emphasis (e.g., Barzel et al, 2016;T. Bauer & Partheil, 2009;Beutelspacher, Danckwerts, Nickel, Spies, & Wickel, 2011;Diehr, 2018;Freudenberg, Winkler, Gallmann, & von Petersdorff, 2014;Hecke, 2010;Prediger, 2013;Weiglhofer, 2004).…”
Section: 0mentioning
confidence: 99%