Vers une modélisation de l'accentuation du français: première partie

Cristo, Albert Di

doi:10.1017/s0959269500004671

Cited by 73 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 65 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although Hf occurred on both final and non-final syllables, however, the resulting pattern was never LHLH. Such instances of non-final rises therefore more closely resemble the various accents d'insistance or accents emphatiques mentioned by Di Cristo (1999aCristo ( , 1999bCristo ( , 2000 and others, and they are distinct from the LHi of the framework we are assuming here.…”

Section: Lhi and Information Structuresupporting

confidence: 78%

“…Di Cristo (2000) observes that non-final rises occur in conjunction with final accents in cases of information focus 2 . In that proposal, constituency at various levels of the grammar may be reflected in prosodic structure by a "bipolarization" effect, whereby "promotion of the extremities" of some constituent results in accents being assigned to both its left and right edges.…”

Section: Lhi and Information Structurementioning

confidence: 98%

“…According to this model, the AP is characterized by two tonal events, which in other frameworks may be referred to as primary and secondary accents (Pasdeloup 1990;Di Cristo 2000). The primary accent is a LH* phrase final accent marked by a noticeable f0 movement as well as by preboundary lengthening.…”

Section: French Prosodic Structure: Basic Notionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Despite the ongoing debate about French intonation structure, most intonation models of French do generally include a high level of constituency, the Intonation Phrase (Post 2000;Fougeron 2000, 2002), corresponding to the intonation unit of more traditional descriptive work (cf. Di Cristo 2000).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A multi-level approach to focus,phrasing and intonation in French

D’Imperio¹,

German²,

Michelas³

2012

Prosody and Meaning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Lhi and Information Structuresupporting

confidence: 78%

Section: Lhi and Information Structurementioning

confidence: 98%

Section: French Prosodic Structure: Basic Notionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A multi-level approach to focus,phrasing and intonation in French

D’Imperio¹,

German²,

Michelas³

2012

Prosody and Meaning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…En ce qui concerne l'accent secondaire, vu que l'intensité augmente dans les deux types de SAs (avec un ou avec deux accents) et étant donné les contours mélodiques montants-descendants-montants qui accompagnent les SAs avec deux accents, on peut supposer que c'est tout de même la mélodie qui marque l'accent initial dans cette variété. Au regard de ces observations, les résultats québécois suivent la description traditionnelle du français européen, où les corrélats acoustiques de l'accent sont la durée et la mélodie (Cumming 2011;Di Cristo 1999, 2000Hirst et Di Cristo 1997 entre autres). L'augmentation de l'intensité sur la deuxième syllabe en FQ devrait être explorée plus amplement.…”

unclassified

(Non-)variabilité du rythme en français canadien

Kaminskaïa

2018

SHS Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Résumé. Le français ontarien partage la grammaire phonologique avec son parent québécois, tout en présentant des divergences conditionnées par la distance géographique et par le contact avec l'anglais. Le rythme du français ontarien a fait objet d'une série d'études récentes utilisant des mesures rythmiques, mais cet aspect prosodique n'a pas démontré d'influence du contexte minoritaire et du contact avec l'anglais. De plus, les données du contexte minoritaire ont montré une rythmicité plus syllabique (française) que celles des contextes majoritaires. Les mesures rythmiques seules manquant de capacité d'explication, pour explorer plus précisément les origines de ces résultats inattendus, nous comparons les données du français ontarien en contact et du français québécois, et explorons la typologie syllabique, la longueur et la durée des groupes accentuels, les rapports de durée des syllabes au sein d'un groupe accentuel et l'intensité des voyelles dans les limites de ce groupe. Des enregistrements spontanés ont servi à cette étude. Les résultats démontrent des similarités mais aussi des différences importantes qui tiennent à la distribution des durées syllabiques et à l'intensité des voyelles, et suggèrent qu'en français, en contexte minoritaire, l'intensité serait un corrélat acoustique de l'accent rythmique primaire et secondaire. Abstract. Rhythmic (in)variability in Canadian French.While sharing phonology with the parent Quebec variety, French spoken in Ontario shows differences that are due to the contact with English and to the geographical distance from Quebec. However, a number of recent studies focusing on prosodic rhythm and applying rhythm metrics did not reveal any effect of language contact. Moreover, not only they did not observe in Ontario French a more stress-timed pattern proper to the majority language, they found that the minority French data has an even more syllable-timed (French) pattern. Rhythm metrics alone are not able to explain these unexpected results, therefore, in order to better understand them, we are undertaking a comparative analysis of Ontario and Quebec spontaneous data focusing on syllabic typology, length and duration of the stress group, syllable duration ratios within it, and vowel intensity. Results reveal rhythmic similarities but also important differences that pertain to the duration ratios and to the distribution of the intensity within the stress group, suggesting that the intensity is an important acoustic correlate of primary and secondary stress in French spoken in contact with English.

show abstract

Speech through the Ear, the Eye, the Mouth and the Hand

Dohen

2009

Multimodal Signals: Cognitive and Algorithmic Issues

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter aims at describing how speech is multimodal not only in its perception but also in its production. It first focuses on multimodal perception of speech segments and speech prosody. It describes how multimodal perception is linked to speech production and explains why we consider speech perception as a sensory-motor process. It then analyses some aspects of hand-mouth coordination in spoken communication. Input from evolutionary perspectives, ontogenesis and behavioral studies on infants and adults are combined to detail how and why this coordination is crucial in speech.

show abstract

Vers une modélisation de l'accentuation du français: première partie

Cited by 73 publications

References 65 publications

A multi-level approach to focus,phrasing and intonation in French

A multi-level approach to focus,phrasing and intonation in French

(Non-)variabilité du rythme en français canadien

Speech through the Ear, the Eye, the Mouth and the Hand

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About