“…For comparison, σ neff calculated by our model was 0.33%, 0.18%, 0.12%, 0.23%, and 0.20% for the fp-, fs-, sc-, sp-, and ss-MNWs, which is one order of magnitude smaller than the ones of the DCA and CAE methods (~7% of DCA method and ~8% for the CAE method, see Figure S2 in the Supplementary Materials for details). Such a huge improvement is crucial for various situations where an accurate propagation constant is required (e.g., routers, couplers, and correlators) [ 47 ]. Besides the accurate prediction of n eff , our model is able to obtain other waveguiding properties ( L m , A m , and FOM) that have not been demonstrated by the DCA and CAE methods, yielding a comprehensive study of the plasmon modes in MNWs.…”