2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.08.346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Versatility of pectoralis major myocutaneous flap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique may not be preferred in vessel-depleted irradiated neck, morbid patients who cannot tolerate prolonged anesthesia or in communities where the extra cost of microvascular surgery is prohibitive [ 10 , 11 ]. Pedicled myocutaneous flaps such as the pectoralis major flap are classic option characterized by technical simplicity and reliable blood supply [ 12 , 13 ]. These flaps are often too bulky, necessitate secondary revisional surgeries and had higher rate of complications especially in female patients [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique may not be preferred in vessel-depleted irradiated neck, morbid patients who cannot tolerate prolonged anesthesia or in communities where the extra cost of microvascular surgery is prohibitive [ 10 , 11 ]. Pedicled myocutaneous flaps such as the pectoralis major flap are classic option characterized by technical simplicity and reliable blood supply [ 12 , 13 ]. These flaps are often too bulky, necessitate secondary revisional surgeries and had higher rate of complications especially in female patients [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of pedicled myocutaneous flaps is another excellent surgical option, characterized by technical simplicity and good blood supply. 20 21 However, the disadvantages of these flaps are the bulky volume, the requirement of secondary revisional surgeries and a higher rate of complications, especially in female patients. 22 23…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, is another classic surgical option, characterized by technical simplicity and robust blood supply. 21 The disadvantages of this flaps are bulky volume and a higher rate of complications especially in female patients. 22 Nowadays, free flaps such as radial artery forearm flap, anterolateral thigh flap or free fibular osseo-myocutaneous flap (if part of the mandible has sacrificed) have become first choice in the last two decades and are still currently used with great success in reconstructing extensive intra-oral defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%