2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-21014-3_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertebrae Localization, Segmentation and Identification Using a Graph Optimization and an Anatomic Consistency Cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the selected cases, we automatically segmented the thoracolumbar spine vertebrae using Meng et al 2023 method [22] and the skin with a binary segmentation approach on each slice of the volumetric image. The results were then turned into meshes using the marching-cubes algorithm [2].…”
Section: Nmdid Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the selected cases, we automatically segmented the thoracolumbar spine vertebrae using Meng et al 2023 method [22] and the skin with a binary segmentation approach on each slice of the volumetric image. The results were then turned into meshes using the marching-cubes algorithm [2].…”
Section: Nmdid Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 3D vertebra model positions obtained from the EOS Imaging system [7] and the automatic CT segmentation [22], we computed the 3D spine characteristics.…”
Section: Spine 3d Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used an anatomically informed framework trained on the VerSE datasets 46 to segment the different vertebrae on CT imaging 47 . The authors of the framework showed a dice score of 91.04 on a large test set.…”
Section: Epidemological Analysis Spinal Cord Injury Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Previous works 31,32 also showed the limitation of the single methods and required pre-processing of the medical image, modification of framework, or incorporation of prior knowledge. We noticed that Mask R-CNN may have missed the prediction for those vertebral bodies, which have the incomplete boundary since the first step of object detection fails to identify the bounding box of the incomplete vertebral body, while U-Net is more reliable to find vertebral bodies as it performs semantic segmentation, that is binary classification at pixel level (Fig.…”
Section: Ensemble Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%