2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(03)00113-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertebral artery complications in anterior approaches to the cervical spine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many other studies described vascular injuries during ACDF [5,6,45]. We did not t have any VA or any other vascular injuries in our series.…”
Section: Vascular Injurymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Many other studies described vascular injuries during ACDF [5,6,45]. We did not t have any VA or any other vascular injuries in our series.…”
Section: Vascular Injurymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…To facilitate precise preoperative planning, preoperative CT in the ER-position is useful for avoiding the risk of corpectomy. In addition, intraoperative use of imageguided navigation or intraoperative ultrasonography can be beneficial [1,5,23,24]. Thus, the anterior approach without rotation may be better and safer than that with rotation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, with regard to position, anesthetic management is easier. However, there are also several complications associated with the approach, including dysphagia, instrumentation backout, esophageal injury, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, wound infection, radiculopathy, C5 nerve palsy, and vertebral artery (VA) injury [2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,10,19,23,26,29,32,33,40 Vertebral artery injury is a rare but well recognized catastrophic iatrogenic complication of cervical spine surgery with a reported incidence of 0.3%-0.5%. 6,7,13,14,25,28,30 In the case presented in this report, the left VA was at risk during the exposure, osteotomies, and bone reduction for 2 reasons: 1) proximity of the artery to the partially autofused C2-3 vertebral bodies with potential for injury during osteotomy; and 2) anticipated significant alteration in its course that would occur with successful realignment, placing the vessel at risk for shear injury or kinking during translation. Unroofing of the transverse foramen has been previously described to prevent VA kinking during correction of cervical deformity.…”
Section: Role Of Prophylactic Arterial Graftingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Equally important is the caution that needs to be exercised while operating on an injured cervical spine with a unilateral VA occlusion. 6,7,13,14,25,28,30 We hypothesize that initial stabilization with a halo vest orthosis might have prevented this outcome, and even if the halo had failed, at that early stage the patient likely would have been adequately stabilized with a simple posterior instrumented fusion.…”
Section: Surgical Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%