2001
DOI: 10.1080/09670870010011082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertebrate pest damage to wrapped, baled silage in Ireland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the bales examined had been harvested in June and July 2002 and the bale storage characteristics were similar to those observed in a previous study [20]. Bales had a DM content of 286 (SD 93.9) g kg −1 and a pH of 4.3 (SD 0.56).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of the bales examined had been harvested in June and July 2002 and the bale storage characteristics were similar to those observed in a previous study [20]. Bales had a DM content of 286 (SD 93.9) g kg −1 and a pH of 4.3 (SD 0.56).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Only 4% of damaged bales were repaired and these were generally repaired using adhesive plastic repair patches. Damaged plastic film on bales is normally repaired in the interval between wrapping the bales and transporting them to the storage site [20]. Anecdotal evidence indicates that any subsequent damage that occurs during storage is usually not repaired.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bale wrapping, handling and storage were typical of Irish on‐farm practices (O’Kiely et al. , 1998; McNamara et al. , 2001) although there have been noteworthy changes since these studies were undertaken.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In bale silages, more than 40% of the silage DM stored is within 120 mm of the film cover and the reduced total thickness of the combined layers of stretch film on the bale side, usually 70 μm (4 layers) to 105 μm (6 layers), could be expected to make individually wrapped bales more susceptible to oxygen ingress (Forristal and O'Kiely, 2005). Even small holes that can occur on farm due to both mechanical and wildlife factors can result in quantitative DM losses because of mold growth, especially in conserved forages with higher DM contents (McNamara et al, 2001;Müller et al, 2007). Air penetration into the silage stimulates aerobic bacteria, yeasts, and molds and causes aerobic deterioration (O'Brien et al, 2007;Borreani and Tabacco, 2008a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%