Specimens from the bone beds of the Ohesaare Cliff on Saaremaa Island, Estonia (Fig. 1A, B), were the basis for the taxonomic description of vertebrate microremains by Christian Pander in 1856. All of the type specimens for the taxa erected by Pander have been long lost, but neotypes have never been nominated for any of his stem chondrichthyan (acanthodian) species. After Pander's (1856) publication, more species were subsequently erected for acanthodian scales from Saaremaa Island by Rohon (1893) and Hoppe (1931( ), but Gross (1947 regarded these taxa as junior synonyms of Pander's two species Gomphodus sandelensis and Nostolepis striata. Similarly, Gross also regarded many of the species erected by Brotzen (1934) and Lehman (1937) for acanthodian scales from Baltic-derived Lochkovian erratics in northern Germany and from the upper Silurian of Scania, Sweden, respectively, as junior synonyms of G. sandelensis and N. striata. Gross (1947) did, however, consider three species -Poracanthodes punctatus Brotzen (1934), P. porosus Brotzen (1934) and Diplacanthoides robustus Brotzen (1934) -to be valid taxa, although he reassigned the last species to Nostolepis robusta. Gross (1971) also erected another species Nostolepis gracilis for acanthodian scales found at the Ohesaare Cliff and in Balticderived erratics and emended Gomphodus to Gomphonchus as the former name was occupied by the Cretaceous hetero dontiform shark Gomphodus Reuss, 1846. Gross (1947 considered Thelolepis volborthi Rohon, 1893, Diplacanthoides elegans Brotzen, 1934 and Poracanthus biblicus Lehman, 1937 to be junior synonyms of Gom phonchus sandelensis, Nostolepis striata and Poracanthodes porosus, respectively, but Vergoossen (1999aVergoossen ( , 2002 considered these to be valid species; Valiukevičius ( 2004) also regarded Diplacanthoides elegans as a valid species. Since Gross's publications, many new acan thodian species from upper Silurian type localities in the Baltic have been raised (e.g. Märss 1986;Valiukevičius 1998Valiukevičius , 2003aValiukevičius , 2004, with that type material all catalogued and reposited in institutional collections.Acanthodian taxonomy has undergone some dramatic changes since the work of J. Valiukevičius and J. Vergoossen. Current consensus is that all acanthodians are stem chondrichthyans, but many taxa formerly included in the Order Climatiiformes within the group are outside the Acanthodii clade (e.g. Coates et al. 2018). Most of these taxa do not have superposed growth zones 17