2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertebroplasty comparing injectable calcium phosphate cement compared with polymethylmethacrylate in a unique canine vertebral body large defect model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cellular viability was measured using a Methyl Tetrazolium Salt (MTS) assay as previously described [36,37]. Briefly, SW1353 were allowed to attach in 24-well plates at a final density of 10,000 cells/cm 2 . After 24 h, culture medium was removed and 500 ml of rinsed ruthenium labelled hydrogel (case 2) were added in each well.…”
Section: Viability Of Chondrocytes Cultured In Presence Of Labelled Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cellular viability was measured using a Methyl Tetrazolium Salt (MTS) assay as previously described [36,37]. Briefly, SW1353 were allowed to attach in 24-well plates at a final density of 10,000 cells/cm 2 . After 24 h, culture medium was removed and 500 ml of rinsed ruthenium labelled hydrogel (case 2) were added in each well.…”
Section: Viability Of Chondrocytes Cultured In Presence Of Labelled Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the needs for bone repair surgery focus more and more on sophisticated regenerative scaffolds, such as injectable calcium phosphate based material for minimally invasive surgical techniques [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. In that context, two original devices made of biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) granules suspended into polysaccharide-based media were designed in our laboratory about ten years ago [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the incidence of vertebral compression fractures continues to rise as our population ages (12), cement augmentation will no doubt be performed more extensively, and more information is needed about this relatively new procedure. Biomechanical studies of vertebroplasty have largely focused on the effects of cement augmentation on the strength and stiffness of single vertebrae, where the overall trend shows increased or maintained vertebral strength (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26), and decreased or maintained stiffness (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) except when a large volume of cement was injected (13). In contrast, multi-level spine models that more closely approximate physiological conditions are limited and more heterogeneous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors suggest the use of this material even for the treatment of fractures in younger patients. Such a choice may be controversial: in spite of its excellent biomechanical capacity, it has no osteointegrative characteristics [2]. The use of a crystal, calcium phosphate cement (CPC), seems to be more interesting given its good biocompatibility and theoretical osteointegration: it should be reabsorbed slowly with time and ''substituted'' with bony tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%