2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11577-018-0537-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verteilungseffekte von Finanzialisierung

Abstract: If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature on financialisation reveals a negative effect on labour costs and income distribution (Tridico and Pariboni 2018;Alvarez 2015;Hein and Van Treeck 2010;Crotty 2005). Kohler, Guschanski and Stockhammer (2018) have already reviewed the principal literature on financialisation and income inequality, concluding that there is a negative and significant association that operates through various channels requiring different empirical measures. These contributions confirm the well-known conclusion supported by Lazonick and O'Sullivan (2000) of a shift in corporate strategy from 'retain and reinvest' to 'downsize and distribute' as a consequence of shareholder value maximization.…”
Section: The Social Consequences Of Financialisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature on financialisation reveals a negative effect on labour costs and income distribution (Tridico and Pariboni 2018;Alvarez 2015;Hein and Van Treeck 2010;Crotty 2005). Kohler, Guschanski and Stockhammer (2018) have already reviewed the principal literature on financialisation and income inequality, concluding that there is a negative and significant association that operates through various channels requiring different empirical measures. These contributions confirm the well-known conclusion supported by Lazonick and O'Sullivan (2000) of a shift in corporate strategy from 'retain and reinvest' to 'downsize and distribute' as a consequence of shareholder value maximization.…”
Section: The Social Consequences Of Financialisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous scholars have conducted rich research on corporate financialization. The studies on the economic consequences of corporate financialization include those on the differential impacts of financialized markets on management procedures and risk attitudes (Siepel & Nightingale, 2014), the possible positive impact of financialized markets on corporate governance (Matsumoto, 2020), the decline in entity investment due to financialization (Maria Diez-Esteban et al, 2016;Davis, 2017;Jin et al, 2022), the impact of the financialization of the non-financial sector on its economic growth (Tomaskovic-Devey et al, 2015), the decrease in the financialization of the functional income distribution (Kohler et al, 2018), the possibly negative effect of corporate financialization on corporate environmental responsibility (Li et al, 2020), and the possibility for financialization to lead to a decrease in the share of wages (Kohler et al, 2019). Thus, this demonstrates that the excessive engagement of non-financial capital enterprises in financial business development has certain negative effects on individuals, enterprises, and society, although the development of corporate financialization promotes the rapid development of enterprises to a certain extent; moreover, to curb corporate financialization, it is necessary to explore the reasons behind the influence of corporate financialization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%