2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.100.056013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertex renormalization and hard scattering symmetry breaking corrections to B to axial vector meson form factors at large recoil

Abstract: The symmetries arise due to heavy quark and large energy limit help us to reduce the number of independent form factors in the heavy-to-light B-meson decays. It is expected that these symmetry relations are not exact and are broken by the perturbative effects, namely, the vertex corrections and the hard-spectator scatterings. The former are included in the form factors via vertex renormalization whereas the later are calculated through lightcone distribution amplitudes. We first calculate these symmetry breaki… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our choice of A(E F ) is such that the factorizable part of A(E F ) is O(α s ) suppressed compared to other form factors. This is consistent to our previous LEET results for form factors [29]. The C A A 1 is the coefficient obtained by matching A-type operators with axial-vector current A 1 = γ μ γ 5 in the full theory.…”
Section: Soft-overlap Function and Branching Fractionssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our choice of A(E F ) is such that the factorizable part of A(E F ) is O(α s ) suppressed compared to other form factors. This is consistent to our previous LEET results for form factors [29]. The C A A 1 is the coefficient obtained by matching A-type operators with axial-vector current A 1 = γ μ γ 5 in the full theory.…”
Section: Soft-overlap Function and Branching Fractionssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The decoupling of soft-collinear modes made our factorization successful. Moreover, if they did not decouple they would have appeared as end-point divergences in convolution integrals (1), which is in contrast to the LEET as discussed in [29]. To mention, the LEET does not correctly produce the infrared divergences; therefore, we left with end-point divergences arising from the convolution integral at a leading twist.…”
Section: Scet II Operators and Scet I → Scet Ii Matchingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, the symmetry relations when these decays involve the semi-light (m ∼ [1-1.5 GeV]) axial-vector and tensor mesons were first obtained by Ebert et al [20]. At O(α s ), the symmetry breaking corrections in the case B to axial-vector mesons (K 1 (1270), K 1 (1400)) were calculated in [21]. It is, therefore, interesting to find such corrections when B decaying to the tensor mesons, K * 2 (1430), f 2 (1270) and a 2 (1320), all having J P = 2 + .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We can see that figure 1 contains both ultraviolet (UV) and IR divergences. The UV divergences get regulated by dimensional regularization, while to regulate the IR divergences, we introduce a small gluon mass λ [21]. We use the same IR regulator for full theory and HQET/LEET and notice that the IR terms have the same Dirac structure Γ which allows these contributions to be absorbed in soft-form factors.…”
Section: Vertex Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar decay involving axial-vector meson in the final state, i.e. B → Aγ is calculated in the context of large-energy-effective theory (LEET) [7] and using soft-collinear effective theory (SCET) [8]. The radiative…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%