2000
DOI: 10.1364/ao.39.001351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical attenuation coefficient of photosynthetically active radiation as a function of chlorophyll concentration and depth in case 1 waters

Abstract: Based on empirical relations found in the literature, relatively simple mathematical models of the average of the total absorption of seawater [a(T(z,Chl))], the chlorophyll-specific absorption coefficient of phytoplankton [a*(ph(z,Chl))], and the backscattering coefficient [b(b(Chl))], weighted by the in situ spectral distribution of photosynthetically active scalar irradiance (PAR), as functions of chlorophyll concentration and depth, were developed. The models for a(T(z,Chl)) and b(b(Chl)) can be used to ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed studies of the relationships between k and the chl a concentration for Case 1 waters have been done by Morel (1988) and Giles-Guzman & Alvarez-Borrego (2000) whose average results are very close to the result of Riley (1956) that we use below. The resulting k values averaged from the 3 relationships in the 1 to 10 mg m -3 of chl a interval (typical values for our region) exhibit a coefficient of variation of only 8% (4% in the 1 to 6 mg m -3 of chl a interval.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Detailed studies of the relationships between k and the chl a concentration for Case 1 waters have been done by Morel (1988) and Giles-Guzman & Alvarez-Borrego (2000) whose average results are very close to the result of Riley (1956) that we use below. The resulting k values averaged from the 3 relationships in the 1 to 10 mg m -3 of chl a interval (typical values for our region) exhibit a coefficient of variation of only 8% (4% in the 1 to 6 mg m -3 of chl a interval.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…[] to partition the effects of different optical components on PAR attenuation in the open ocean. However, there has been little subsequent application of this approach [ Giles‐Guzman and Alvarez‐Borrego , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modifi cation to this model proposed by Giles -Guzm á n and Á lvarez- Borrego (2000) was used for case I gulf waters: P T(z) = [P* m(z) φ max Chl (z) a* ph(z,Chl) PAR (z) ] × [(0.02315P* m(z) ) 2 + (PAR (z) a* ph(z,Chl) φ max ) 2 ] -0.5 .…”
Section: Estimates Of Phytoplankton Production From Satellite Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average specifi c absorption coeffi cient of phytoplankton is a* ph(z,Chl) (m 2 mg Chl -1 ) weighted by the in situ spectral distribution of PAR and calculated following Giles -Guzm á n and Á lvarez- Borrego (2000) . The factor 0.02315 converts mol C to mg C, seconds to hours, and mol photons to μ mol photons.…”
Section: Estimates Of Phytoplankton Production From Satellite Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation