Vertical collaboration in the semiconductor industry: A decision framework for supply chain relationships

Bahinipati, Bikram K.; Deshmukh, S.G.

doi:10.1016/j.cie.2011.10.017

Cited by 41 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 86 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As the customer demands are placed at finished goods level, manufacturing Bahinipati and Deshmukh (2012). requirements are communicated to final test, assembly, wafer probe, and to the foundries. Efficient means of communication are necessary to ensure the success of the process, which can be achieved through the participation of the supply chain partners in the e-marketplaces.…”

Section: The Supply Chain Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The general relationships between the members of fabless supply chain (subcontractors and customers) are depicted in Figure 1. As the customer demands are placed at finished goods level, manufacturing Source: Bahinipati and Deshmukh (2012). Research, 1, 2 (2012): 193-207 requirements are communicated to final test, assembly, wafer probe, and to the foundries.…”

Section: The Supply Chain Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Coevolutionary Model as a Collaborative Mechanism for the Business Exchange in the High-technology Industrial Value Chain

Kabiraj

Uniyal

2012

Jindal Journal of Business Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The High-technology industries are highly capital-intensive enterprises dealing with short life cycle products, offering potential to simultaneously examine different perspectives of collaborative relationships. Although the extant literature on collaborative activities in business enterprises has progressed along the different stages in the industrial value chain, there is lack of cohesion in the current state of the art. Conceptual clarity and contextual description in particular are dispersed and disintegrated in the current state. In order to integrate the literature and highlight its contributions, it is essential to provide a more technical description and a discussion on supply chain collaboration from various perspectives of the High-technology industry. In this article, the issues pertaining to responsiveness, collaborative development practices, strategic procurement and information technology (IT), and control-oriented approaches are presented. By effectively doing so, we provide a comprehensive literature review to determine the scope for future research in the High-technology industries and other similar manufacturing environments.

show abstract

Section: The Supply Chain Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Supply Chain Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Coevolutionary Model as a Collaborative Mechanism for the Business Exchange in the High-technology Industrial Value Chain

Kabiraj

Uniyal

2012

Jindal Journal of Business Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nas indústrias intensivas em conhecimento, como a indústria eletroeletrônica, e especificamente, a de semicondutores (WU et al, 2015), fatores como a rapidez das inovações no setor tem apontado que a maioria das inovações são desenvolvidas a partir de projetos colaborativos (BAHINIPATI et al, 2012;BROWN et al, 2009;KAPOOR et al, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Os processos de inovação aberta: uma análise na indústria brasileira de semicondutores

Oliveira¹,

Olave²

2018

RBADM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nos últimos anos, para conseguir inovar, as empresas tem se tornado cada vez mais dependentes de conhecimentos e recursos gerados fora das fronteiras organizacionais. Assim, o processo de inovação nas organizações passou a considerar a contribuição de diferentes agentes externos, dentre eles clientes, fornecedores e universidades. Na perspectiva da inovação aberta, segundo Gassman e Enkel (2004), os processos de inovação podem ser categorizados em três tipos: de entrada ou outside-in, de saída ou inside-out, e por fim, o processo acoplado ou coupled process, sendo esses arquétipos caracterizados pela adoção de diferentes atividades. O presente artigo teve como objetivo identificar os processos de inovação aberta adotados pelas design houses brasileiras no desenvolvimento conjunto de projetos de circuitos integrados, para isso, foi utilizado o survey como método de pesquisa, com a realização de análise documental e a aplicação de questionários estruturados com design houses e especialistas da área de microeletrônica. Os dados foram analisados com o auxílio do programa SPSS (versão 21), por meio da utilização de técnicas descritivas e estatísticas, dentre elas a aplicação do teste do qui-quadrado. Os resultados mostraram que as design houses estudadas implementam diversas práticas do paradigma de inovação aberta no desenvolvimento de projetos de circuitos integrados, sendo as práticas referentes ao processo de entrada as mais frequentes, além disso, foi possível observar que não existiam diferenças significativas quando a design house possui ou não fins lucrativos e os processos de inovação aberta adotados.

show abstract

“…During independent R&D innovation, the profit function of the upstream enterprise is as follows: The optimum condition can be used to solve and obtain: Vertical technology overflow exists between upstream and downstream enterprises participating in cooperation [9]. At this point, the profit functions of downstream member enterprises and downstream non-member enterprises are as follows respectively:…”

Section: Independent Randd Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis on the Tactics and Benefit of Vertical Cooperative R&D Innovation in Supply Chain

Sheng¹,

Wang²,

Xue³

2015

TOCSJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vertical cooperative innovation during supply chain may overcome the high investment in R&D and uncertainty, and it also can avoid risks, shorten product development cycles. In this paper, a vertical cooperative R&D model is built in the upstream monopoly supply chain based on game theory. The following conclusions is drawn: Monopoly in the upstream vertical cooperative R&D model, with the absorptive capacity of enterprises and the overflow level of the increase in corporate R&D results, the upstream and downstream businesses will increase profits. The upstream monopoly enterprise cannot force the downstream companies to join the cooperative R&D alliance, and undertake research and development costs too much. To maximize profits, the upstream companies can only travel companies in the following bound for the standard to determine the number of member companies and the downstream cost-sharing ratio.

show abstract

Vertical collaboration in the semiconductor industry: A decision framework for supply chain relationships

Cited by 41 publications

References 86 publications

A Coevolutionary Model as a Collaborative Mechanism for the Business Exchange in the High-technology Industrial Value Chain

A Coevolutionary Model as a Collaborative Mechanism for the Business Exchange in the High-technology Industrial Value Chain

Os processos de inovação aberta: uma análise na indústria brasileira de semicondutores

Analysis on the Tactics and Benefit of Vertical Cooperative R&D Innovation in Supply Chain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About