1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00121799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical cross-spectra of horizontal velocity components at the Boulder observatory

Abstract: Cross-spectra between horizontal wind components at different levels ofthe Boulder Atmospheric Observatory (BAO) tower lead to the following conclusions:(1) Davenport's hypothesis is satisfied that coherence decays exponentially with the ratio of vertical separation to horizontal wave length, at least to very small values of coherence.(2) The decay coefficients increase with z/L for z/L < 0.5. For larger stabilities, irregular fluctuations with periods of order lo-20 min have considerable vertical coherence. R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For ζ ≤ −0.3, c u 1 ≈ 11.1 is relatively constant, c u 1 ≈ 12.9 for neutral stratification, while for stable conditions, c u 1 increases substantially with c u 1 > 30 for ζ > 1. Such a variation with the atmospheric stratification has been observed onshore by, for example, Pielke and Panofsky (1970) who found c u 1 ≈ 19 ± 3 for neutral conditions, or Soucy et al (1982) who expressed the variation of the decay parameters c u 1 and c v 1 with ζ as the dependency of the computed coherence with the atmospheric stability is shared between the two fitted coefficients, with c w 1 depending little on the atmospheric stratification. For example, its value fluctuates from 3.6 for an unstable stratification to 5 for a stable atmosphere.…”
Section: Case Of a Near-neutral Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 62%
“…For ζ ≤ −0.3, c u 1 ≈ 11.1 is relatively constant, c u 1 ≈ 12.9 for neutral stratification, while for stable conditions, c u 1 increases substantially with c u 1 > 30 for ζ > 1. Such a variation with the atmospheric stratification has been observed onshore by, for example, Pielke and Panofsky (1970) who found c u 1 ≈ 19 ± 3 for neutral conditions, or Soucy et al (1982) who expressed the variation of the decay parameters c u 1 and c v 1 with ζ as the dependency of the computed coherence with the atmospheric stability is shared between the two fitted coefficients, with c w 1 depending little on the atmospheric stratification. For example, its value fluctuates from 3.6 for an unstable stratification to 5 for a stable atmosphere.…”
Section: Case Of a Near-neutral Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 62%
“…An estimation of such coefficients has been proposed by Solari and Piccardo (2001) in neutral conditions, and by Pielke and Panofsky (1970), Ropelewsky et al (1973) and Soucy et al (1982) in non-neutral conditions. More sophisticated coherence models are reported for instance in Deaves and Harris (1978) and Mann (1994).…”
Section: The Turbulence Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2013). We refer to these papers for details beyond the short overview provided coherence of various velocity components in tower micrometeorological data (Davenport, 1961a;Panofsky and Singer, 1965;Pielke and Panofsky, 1971;Naito and Kondo, 1974;Panofsky et al, 1974;Brook, 1975;Seginer and Mulhearn, 1978;Kanda and Royles, 1978;Soucy et al, 1982;Bowen et al, 1983;Saranyasoontorn et al, 2004), investigations including the lateral/spanwise coherence (Kristensen and Jensen, 1979;Ropelewski et al, 1973;Panofsky and Mizuno, 1975;Perry et al, 1978;Kristensen, 1979;Kristensen et al, 1981;Schlez and Infield, 1998), the coherence of temperature fluctuations (Davison, 1976) and even meso-scale applications (typically in the horizontal directions) (Hanna and Chang, 1992;Woods et al, 2011;Vincent et al, 2013;Larsén et al, 2013;Mehrens et al, 2016). Together, these measurements cover a great variety of terrain and topography.…”
Section: Comparing Davenport's Hypothesis Tomentioning
confidence: 99%