Vertical epistemic communities in multilevel governance

Abstract

Literature defines epistemic communities as knowledge-based networks whose purpose is to influence policy. While previous studies often focused on the horizontal functioning of epistemic communities, we expand the debate by integrating the vertical dimension as an additional governing structure. We argue that vertical epistemic communities take advantage of multiple-scale systems to generate coherent strategies which enable them to influence policymaking. Through the case of Swiss smoking prevention policy, we study how vertical epistemic communities in federalist systems can lead to policy harmonisation between member states. They do so by shifting the decision-making process away from the political towards expert arenas.

Multilevel Governance: Framing the Integration of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Policymaking

“…Therefore, solving sustainability problems requires more systematic, multisector, and multilevel approaches (Homsy, 2018a;Sharma & Kearins, 2011). Multilevel governance has also been a framework through which scholars have examined other topics including migration policy, aboriginal self-governance, and smoking cessation policy (Marti, 2018;Mavrot & Sager, 2016;Rodon, 2017).…”

Moving beyond legal compliance: innovative approaches to EU multilevel implementation

“…This insight has important implications for practical implementation in terms of the patterns, mechanisms and actors involved that need exploration. However, accounting for practical implementation adds additional layers of complexity to implementation analyses, and implies a focus on the interaction of different governance levels (Egeberg and Trondal 2009;Exadaktylos and Radaelli 2012;Hill and Hupe 2003;Knill and Tosun 2012;Kuhlmann and Wayenberg 2016;Mavrot and Sager 2016). It also requires a systematic policy evaluation, which is resourceintensive, underdeveloped in many countries, and needs improvement in the EU (Knoepfel et al 2011;Mastenbroek et al 2016;Sabatier and Mazmanian 1980;Treib 2014).…”

Policy evaluation and democracy: Do they fit?

“…The evidence-based policy movement mainly drew from a growing body of policyknowledge gained from policy analysis and transferred them into concrete ideas on how policies should be designed (cf. Mavrot & Sager 2016). Consequently, evaluative evidence was expected to make policies more coherent: addressing the right target groups, increasing the efficiency of their implementation and increasing their effectiveness.…”