2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00484-009-0251-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical gradient of climate change and climate tourism conditions in the Black Forest

Abstract: Due to the public discussion about global and regional warming, the regional climate and the modified climate conditions are analyzed exemplarily for three different regions in the southern Black Forest (southwest Germany). The driving question behind the present study was how can tourism adapt to modified climate conditions and associated changes to the tourism potential in low mountain ranges. The tourism potential is predominately based on the attractiveness of natural resources being climate-sensitive. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1), it is the summer rather than the winter period that has the widest difference between air temperature and PET. This may be due to more rain, and higher fluctuations of solar radiation and other parameters in summer resulting in a different weather profile from other places in the north hemisphere, such as Germany (Endler et al 2010). As can be seen in Figs.…”
Section: Pet Assessment and Classesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…1), it is the summer rather than the winter period that has the widest difference between air temperature and PET. This may be due to more rain, and higher fluctuations of solar radiation and other parameters in summer resulting in a different weather profile from other places in the north hemisphere, such as Germany (Endler et al 2010). As can be seen in Figs.…”
Section: Pet Assessment and Classesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Mean 07:00 LST relative humidity (%) Mean 14:00 LST relative humunity (%) 1 -13.8 -11.8 -13.2 -12.8 -18.5 -19.5 -18.7 -16.4 -13.3 -14.2 -14 -14.8 Mean 21:00 LST relative humidity (%) 07:00:00 PET (ºC) 8.6 9.5 8.6 8.9 8.3 9.5 8.5 7.6 7.0 7.4 7.9 8.9 8.4 14:00:00 PET (ºC) 13.1 14.2 14.3 16.1 16.3 18.8 18.9 19.0 18.6 17.9 16.6 14.4 16.5 21:00:00 PET (ºC) 10.2 11.5 11.3 12.0 11.8 13.0 12.8 12.4 11.7 10.7 10.3 10.4 11.5 Mean PET (ºC) 10.6 11.7 11.4 12.3 12.1 13.7 13.4 13.0 12.4 12.0 11.6 11.3 12.1 relative humidity, and the presence of more greenhouse gases and emissions in the atmosphere (Landsberg, 1981;Oke, 1997) Endler et. al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A frequency of 50% corresponds to an occurrence of the indicated condition during 15 days, 10% to 3 days of the considered month, etc. Considering the first row, thermal comfort occurs from April to September with an average frequency of about 40% meaning that approximately 12 days are characterized by thermal comfort (Endler et al 2010). One of the latest possibilities and tools in studying the relationship between tourism and climate, is the CTIS based on thermal, physical, and aesthetical aspects ( Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%