2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2012.6364807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical handover decision making using QoS reputation and GM(1,1) prediction

Abstract: Telecommunication consumers are fueling a demand for mobile devices that are rapidly increasing in their capability to provide a wider range of services. These services in turn vi 3.2.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They provided the configuration paradigms for the inter-RAT handover thresholds. Giacomini and Agarwal use QoS reputation and GM(1, 1) prediction to make decision on vertical handover [12]. They built on a novel reputation based vertical handover decision rating system in the handover decision making progress.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They provided the configuration paradigms for the inter-RAT handover thresholds. Giacomini and Agarwal use QoS reputation and GM(1, 1) prediction to make decision on vertical handover [12]. They built on a novel reputation based vertical handover decision rating system in the handover decision making progress.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This local gradient ( ) ( ) is similar to the local gradient ( ) ( ) of the backward pass which is defined in (12), except that the target of the partial derivative is changed tõ( ).…”
Section: Handover Parameter Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reputation can also be used for network selection to improve inefficient, nonoptimal, or unstable decisions in the handoff process for network selection. In [21] a solution for fast decisions in VHO by using previous observed QoS and SCTP protocol based on binary trust was studied, and it was improved in [22]. In [23], network selection was modeled as using reputation in cooperative game theory and average received utility was used for ranking phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%