2014
DOI: 10.1002/nag.2324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical impedance of an end‐bearing pile in viscoelastic soil

Abstract: This paper presents a new method to derive the analytical solution for the vertical impedance of an endbearing pile in viscoelastic soil. The soil is assumed as a homogeneous and isotropic layer, and the pile is considered as a one-dimensional Euler rod. Considering both the vertical and radial displacements of soil and soil-pile coupled vibration, the governing equations of the soil and pile are established. The volumetric strain of soil is obtained by transformation on the equations of soil and variable sepa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is attributed to the fact that the plane‐strain model considers only waves propagating in the horizontal direction towards infinity, therefore resonance is not possible. On the other hand, the three‐dimensional model predicts the generation of shear and longitudinal waves; hence, resonance results from the propagation and reflection of standing waves in the soil layer: the dominant frequency, ω 2 , is associated with longitudinal waves and is equal to the natural frequency of the soil deposit for vertical vibrations; while the secondary frequency, ω 1 , corresponds to shear waves and is equal to the natural frequency of the soil deposit for shear vibrations . It must be mentioned here that the imaginary components of the attenuation function and of the interaction factor are not particularly sensitive to the second cutoff frequency ω 2 .…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is attributed to the fact that the plane‐strain model considers only waves propagating in the horizontal direction towards infinity, therefore resonance is not possible. On the other hand, the three‐dimensional model predicts the generation of shear and longitudinal waves; hence, resonance results from the propagation and reflection of standing waves in the soil layer: the dominant frequency, ω 2 , is associated with longitudinal waves and is equal to the natural frequency of the soil deposit for vertical vibrations; while the secondary frequency, ω 1 , corresponds to shear waves and is equal to the natural frequency of the soil deposit for shear vibrations . It must be mentioned here that the imaginary components of the attenuation function and of the interaction factor are not particularly sensitive to the second cutoff frequency ω 2 .…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the pile shaft is assumed perfectly bonded to its surrounding soil. To introduce the stiffness of the pile in the solution, we model it as a 1D cylindrical elastic rod [1][2][3][4][5][6]. This is a reasonable approximation for slender piles (H/R⪢1) subjected to a harmonic vertical force Pe iωt .…”
Section: Formulation Of the Governing Equations Of The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vibration characteristics of the soil-pile system are often quantified via the complex impedance at the pile head [4][5][6]. The vertical impedance K v is defined as the amplitude of the harmonic axial pile force that results in a unit harmonic pile head displacement, therefore the vertical dynamic impedance of the pile is calculated as…”
Section: Vertical Dynamic Impedancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this short communication, we employ a new analytical approach, which was first proposed by the authors to treat the problem of vertical vibration of piles , to solve the problem of an end‐bearing circular pile in viscoelastic soil subjected to harmonic lateral force and bending moment. The advantage of the proposed formulation is that it does not require the introduction of potential functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%