2017
DOI: 10.5194/amt-10-431-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical profiles of the 3-D wind velocity retrieved from multiple wind lidars performing triple range-height-indicator scans

Abstract: Abstract. Vertical profiles of 3-D wind velocity are retrieved from triple range-height-indicator (RHI) scans performed with multiple simultaneous scanning Doppler wind lidars. This test is part of the eXperimental Planetary boundary layer Instrumentation Assessment (XPIA) campaign carried out at the Boulder Atmospheric Observatory. The three wind velocity components are retrieved and then compared with the data acquired through various profiling wind lidars and highfrequency wind data obtained from sonic anem… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on a simple accuracy model (see ) the intersecting angle of 30 • results in an accuracy of about 0.25 m s −1 for the retrieved horizontal wind speed. In order to accurately retrieve the vertical wind speed, the elevation angles should be as steep as possible, preferably 90 • as indicated in Debnath et al (2017). Hence, based on this study's results, which uses a norm approach described in Simley et al (2016) to assess the suitability of the multi-Doppler setup, the elevation angles larger than 45 • provide means to accurately acquire the vertical component.…”
Section: Step 4: Experiments Layout Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a simple accuracy model (see ) the intersecting angle of 30 • results in an accuracy of about 0.25 m s −1 for the retrieved horizontal wind speed. In order to accurately retrieve the vertical wind speed, the elevation angles should be as steep as possible, preferably 90 • as indicated in Debnath et al (2017). Hence, based on this study's results, which uses a norm approach described in Simley et al (2016) to assess the suitability of the multi-Doppler setup, the elevation angles larger than 45 • provide means to accurately acquire the vertical component.…”
Section: Step 4: Experiments Layout Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collected lidar data were further post-processed only when the carrier-to-noise ratio of the lidar signal was larger than −25 dB (Carbajo-Fuertes et al, 2014). The post-processing from the three radial velocities (U r ) to Cartesian wind velocity components (U , V , W ) was carried out following the standard triple-Doppler retrieval (Mikkelsen et al, 2008;Mann et al, 2009;CarbajoFuertes et al, 2014;Debnath et al, 2017;Choukulkar et al, 2017;Simley et al, 2016) by means of the following equations:…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Measurement Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XPIA experiment was carried out at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Boulder Atmospheric Observatory (BAO), near Erie, Colorado, for the period 2 March-31 May 2015. An overview of the field campaign is provided in Lundquist et al (2016), while a detailed analysis of several multiple-Doppler scanning strategies performed with scanning lidars was provided in Choukulkar et al (2017), and vertical profiles of the three wind velocity components performed with triple RHI scans were presented in Debnath et al (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, probing wakes generated by utility-scale wind turbines requires measurement techniques capable to cover such large volumes, while providing adequate spatio-temporal resolution to characterize wake turbulent flows. A very promising remote sensing technique for probing wakes generated by utility-scale wind turbines is light detection and ranging (LiDAR), allowing measurements of ABL flows [14][15][16] and wind turbine wakes [17][18][19] through a variety of scanning strategies ranging from 1D fast scans to characterize wind turbulence [20,21] to volumetric scans for characterizations of 3D ABL flows and wakes [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%