The present study focused on the optimization of procedures for the extraction of viruses from silty freshwater sediments for subsequent enumeration. Viral abundance in 2 different shallow backwater systems of the River Danube (Austria) ranged from 1.45 × 10 9 to 9.58 × 10 9 particles ml -1 wet sediment. The highest virus yields from the bulk of the sediments were obtained by 1 min sonication (3 × 20 s intervals, with 10 s interruptions). An increase in sonication time of up to 5 min decreased viral counts by an average of 15%. Since dissolved DNA within sediment samples could bind to the nucleic acid stain and thereby inflate viral estimates, sediment samples are often treated with DNase before the staining procedure. Moreover, they are usually centrifuged and diluted to a high extent in order to avoid interference of particulate material with virus counting. Centrifugation led to a reduction of viral numbers by 2 to 36% compared to untreated samples and did not reduce the background fluorescence; thus counting of viruses was not facilitated. Diluting 2000 × with Milli-Q water always provided an average of 19% lower viral numbers than diluting 4000 ×. Treatment with DNase had no significant effect on virus counting, with viral numbers in untreated samples being on average 96% of those in DNase-containing samples. Additionally, 2 different nucleic acid stains were compared -viruses stained with SYBR Gold fluoresced brighter than those stained with SYBR Green I and fluorescence lasted longer, while background fluorescence was reduced sufficiently, thus facilitating virus counting. Viral numbers using SYBR Gold were on average twice of those obtained with SYBR Green I. The mean efficiency of virus extraction was 88.8% using the protocol outlined in this paper, and was thus slightly higher than that obtained in previous sediment investigations.
KEY WORDS: Virus extraction · Virus counting · Epifluorescence microscopy · Silty freshwater sedimentResale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher Aquat Microb Ecol 40: 207-216, 2005 Moreover, EFM yields higher and more precise viral counts than TEM (Hennes & Suttle 1995, Weinbauer & Suttle 1997, Noble & Fuhrman 1998. Enumeration of viruses by EFM is based on using highly fluorescent nucleic acid dyes such as DAPI (Hara et al. 1991, Weinbauer & Suttle 1997, Yo-Pro I (Hennes & Suttle 1995, Xenopoulos & Bird 1997, SYBR Green I (Noble & Fuhrman 1998) or SYBR Gold (Chen et al. 2001). Viral abundance in sediment systems is 10-to 1000-fold higher than in the overlying water column (e.g. Maranger & Bird 1996, Steward et al. 1996, Drake et al. 1998, Hewson et al. 2001, Lawrence et al. 2002, Fischer et al. 2003. Studies using EFM to estimate viruses in sediments applied a variety of protocols, without testing whether the procedures carried out before enumeration (e.g. virus dislodgement from particles, centrifugation, dilution) affect viral counts (Danovaro & Serresi 2000, RicciardiRigault et al. 2000, Danovaro et al. 2001, Fischer et a...