2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2010.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical separation versus vertical integration in a macroeconomic model with imperfect competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 To simplify the analysis, the scenario of the tax allowance is not discussed in this paper. 6 Lai, Chin, and Chang (2010) provide reasons for the assumption of an exclusive relationship between upstream and downstream firms. Empirical evidence provided by Heide, Dutta, and Bergen (1998) shows that exclusive dealing is a strategic decision for firms and plays an important role in industrial markets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 To simplify the analysis, the scenario of the tax allowance is not discussed in this paper. 6 Lai, Chin, and Chang (2010) provide reasons for the assumption of an exclusive relationship between upstream and downstream firms. Empirical evidence provided by Heide, Dutta, and Bergen (1998) shows that exclusive dealing is a strategic decision for firms and plays an important role in industrial markets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose of these studies is to explore how the macroeconomic policies affect the relevant macro variables when the product market is imperfectly competitive. More recently, in departing from these existing studies, Lai et al (2010) focus on the issue from the perspective of the industrial structure. To be more specific, they set up an imperfectly competitive macroeconomic model that is able to deal with both vertical separation and vertical integration, and make an effort to examine the relative macroeconomic performance between these two industrial regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%