1999
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199910000-00037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical Shear Fractures of the Femoral Neck A Biomechanical Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
80
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
80
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, three cancellous lag screws oriented along the femoral neck axis and parallel to each other are placed in an inverted triangle. This configuration is biomechanically superior to any other orientation and decreases the risk of subtrochanteric fracture [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. As demonstrated by Lindequist et al [44••] and other previous authors, the first screw should be placed within 3 mm of the cortical calcar femorale to allow a three-point buttressing effect (with fixation in the dense subcortical femoral head, the calcar, and the lateral femoral cortex of entry) [45].…”
Section: Implant Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typically, three cancellous lag screws oriented along the femoral neck axis and parallel to each other are placed in an inverted triangle. This configuration is biomechanically superior to any other orientation and decreases the risk of subtrochanteric fracture [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. As demonstrated by Lindequist et al [44••] and other previous authors, the first screw should be placed within 3 mm of the cortical calcar femorale to allow a three-point buttressing effect (with fixation in the dense subcortical femoral head, the calcar, and the lateral femoral cortex of entry) [45].…”
Section: Implant Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pooling from over 1900 patients, Bhandari found statistically insignificant higher rates of infection, blood loss, and a trend towards a higher four month mortality in those treated with arthroplasty; those treated with internal fixation had a four fold higher risk of subsequent surgery and conversion to hip replacement [60••]. A meta-analysis of 2289 patients by Rogmark et al [38] reviewed 14 studies and showed that primary arthroplasty leads to significantly fewer major method-related hip complications (deep infection, early redisplacement, nonunion, avascular necrosis) and reoperations, compared to internal fixation. In all studies comparing methods of internal fixation, regardless of the type of fixation, the failure rate was 21-57 % and reoperations were performed in 14-53 % of all the cases.…”
Section: Implant Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of long bones provides an example for which strength and failure points in response to compressive, torsional, tensile and shear forces have been studied extensively (9)(10)(11)(12). This detailed understanding has enabled the development of model systems for the femur that accurately classify these fractures and improve reconstruction techniques (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Rinaldi reports 81 -89 % excellent to good results. 27,28 Several biomechanical studies 29,30 have evaluated different implants for managing Pauwels' Type III femoral neck fractures. Baitner et al 29 compared multiple screws to the DHS for treatment of Pauwels' Type III femoral neck fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 Several biomechanical studies 29,30 have evaluated different implants for managing Pauwels' Type III femoral neck fractures. Baitner et al 29 compared multiple screws to the DHS for treatment of Pauwels' Type III femoral neck fracture. They found that the DHS had less inferior femoral head displacement, less shearing displacement and a greater load to failure when compared to the three cannulated cancellous screws.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%