2014
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2013.2295165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical Structure of P-Band Temporal Decorrelation at the Paracou Forest: Results From TropiScat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis was based on synthetic data emulating BIOMASS acquisitions over the tropical forest of Paracou, French Guiana. The 3-D structure of the scatterers at P-band was derived from a high-resolution 3-D reconstruction derived from the airborne TropiSAR data [4], whereas temporal decorrelation information was derived from the ground-based TropiScat experiment [14]. Errors resulting from Faraday Rotation were not considered since BIOMASS will acquire fully polarimetric data, therefore allowing Faraday Rotation correction to within an accuracy ensuring a negligible impact on tomographic results [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The analysis was based on synthetic data emulating BIOMASS acquisitions over the tropical forest of Paracou, French Guiana. The 3-D structure of the scatterers at P-band was derived from a high-resolution 3-D reconstruction derived from the airborne TropiSAR data [4], whereas temporal decorrelation information was derived from the ground-based TropiScat experiment [14]. Errors resulting from Faraday Rotation were not considered since BIOMASS will acquire fully polarimetric data, therefore allowing Faraday Rotation correction to within an accuracy ensuring a negligible impact on tomographic results [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best performance is found in HH, whereas HV is the worst case. This is readily explained considering that scattering in HH and VV is strongly contributed by the ground layer [4], which has a lower temporal decorrelation rate than the vegetation above [14].…”
Section: Biomass Performance In Repeat-pass Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming a vegetation layer with a top height of 50 m, the resulting number of passages for tomographic imaging can be assessed in about six (the height of ambiguity z amb = 110 m) per site, letting the overall BA equal the critical baseline. More passages can be exploited to enhance system robustness versus ionospheric disturbances [12] and severe weather conditions [13], [14].…”
Section: Biomass Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multibaseline 3D SAR Tomography (TomoSAR) [1][2][3][4][5] is an important advancement of SAR Interferometry [1,4,6], allowing to sense complex scenarios with multiple heightdistributed scatterers mapped in the SAR cell, by means of spatial (baseline) spectral estimation. Beyond layover solution in garbled urban areas [1,4], and recent ice investigations [7], emerging tomographic remote sensing applications regard forest scenarios [1,2,5,8,9], e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%