2017
DOI: 10.1071/zo18006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Very low rate of multiple paternity detected in clutches of a wild agamid lizard

Abstract: Genetic mating systems described for squamate reptiles range from primarily monogamous to completely polygynandrous. The presence of female multiple mating is almost ubiquitous among squamates and even occurs, albeit at a low rate, in socially monogamous species. Here we examine the genetic mating system of the territorial tawny dragon lizard (Ctenophorus decresii). Paternity was assigned to captive-born hatchlings using eight microsatellite loci, revealing a 4% rate of multiple paternity. One-quarter of males… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microsatellite genotypes presented in Hacking, Stuart‐Fox et al. () were used to estimate relatedness between each mother, her mate, and all available males, using Coancestry ver. 1.0.1.5 (Wang, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Microsatellite genotypes presented in Hacking, Stuart‐Fox et al. () were used to estimate relatedness between each mother, her mate, and all available males, using Coancestry ver. 1.0.1.5 (Wang, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlation analyses were undertaken using the glm function in R (R Core Team ). For both relatedness and genomewide diversity estimates, eight microsatellite loci were used, seven of which have high polymorphic information content values (≥0.85) (Hacking, Stuart‐Fox, et al., ). Note, however, that it is difficult to gain an accurate estimation of genomewide diversity and these microsatellite loci may not be adequate (DeWoody & DeWoody, ; Väli, Einarsson, Waits, & Ellegren, ), although see (Ljungqvist, Akesson, & Hansson, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations