1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37976-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vesicoureteral Reflux in Patients with Double Pigtail Stents

Abstract: A prospective study of 30 renal units in 27 patients with double pigtail ureteral stents seen at our hospital was done. The aim of the study was to confirm or rule out the occurrence of vesicoureteral reflux radiologically, and to define its degree in stented patients. During the filling phase of the cystourethrogram, reflux occurred in 19 of the 30 renal units (63%). Of those 19 renal units the reflux was grade 1/4 in 15 (79%), while in 4 (21%) it was of higher grades (2 to 3/4). During the voiding phase of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, pain associated with hydronephrosis and upper urinary tract infection due to vesicoureteral reflux triggered by indwelling ureteral stents would presumably be decreased if the portion that traverses the ureterovesical junction were missing. 17 Stents lacking a distal tail decrease vesicoureteral reflux. 18,19 After the Uriprene stent shortened from the distal end by day 7, the degree of pressure transmission and reflux decreased, possibly resulting in the decreased hydronephrosis ob- served as early as 7 days after insertion in the biodegradable stented animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, pain associated with hydronephrosis and upper urinary tract infection due to vesicoureteral reflux triggered by indwelling ureteral stents would presumably be decreased if the portion that traverses the ureterovesical junction were missing. 17 Stents lacking a distal tail decrease vesicoureteral reflux. 18,19 After the Uriprene stent shortened from the distal end by day 7, the degree of pressure transmission and reflux decreased, possibly resulting in the decreased hydronephrosis ob- served as early as 7 days after insertion in the biodegradable stented animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thought to be a result of urine reflux from the bladder to the kidney especially with the increased pressure created during voiding [9]. Some studies have shown that a-blockers enhance lower ureteral stone clearance in both genders, possibly as a result of ureteral dilation or relaxation [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after reviewing the literature, we found some case reports and small series reporting morbidity and complications related to indwelling stents. Side effects and complications of stents include early complications such as patient’s discomfort, irritative bladder symptoms, bacteriuria with or without clinical urinary tract infections, urosepsis, hematuria [5, 14], or flank pain [5, 7, 15]and late complications such as upward or downward stent migration [7, 14], calcification, and fragmentation [15]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The etiology of flank pain during voiding has been suggested to be secondary to vesicorenal reflux through the stent during periods of increased intravesical pressure [5]. Mosli et al [15]demonstrated an incidence of 79% for reflux grade 1 and one of 21% for reflux grades 2 and 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%