2019
DOI: 10.21608/ejentas.2019.4233.1024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vestibular and radiological evaluation of hearing impaired children with delayed Motor development

Abstract: Background: Combined hearing and vestibular loss in children pose potentially significant problems. Children and infants with vestibular problems are faced with motor problems that could limit their normal development. Objectives: the aim of the study is to assess the relationship between the vestibular disorders and the delayed motor development in hearing impaired children as well as to assess the integrity of the vestibular system through clinical testing and radiological imaging in those children with dela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these findings contradicted the findings of Noguchi et al who reported that vertigo/dizziness/ imbalance accounts for approximately 8.8% of EVA patients [44]. Furthermore, Madden et al reported that vestibular symptoms were present in only three (4%) of the studied patients with EVA [45].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these findings contradicted the findings of Noguchi et al who reported that vertigo/dizziness/ imbalance accounts for approximately 8.8% of EVA patients [44]. Furthermore, Madden et al reported that vestibular symptoms were present in only three (4%) of the studied patients with EVA [45].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…EVA is the most common abnormal inner ear anomalies. Its prevalence rate in pediatric patients ranges between 5 and 15% [32,44]. This study showed a higher prevalence of EVA among female population (54.4%), as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“… Jackler et al 1987 [ 5 ], Reilly et al 1989 [ 9 ], Antonelli et al 1999 [ 10 ], McClay et al 2002 [ 11 ], Abdullah et al 2003 [ 12 ], Wu et al 2005 [ 6 ], Shim et al 2006 [ 13 ], Ma et al 2008 [ 14 ], McClay et al 2008 [ 15 ], Yuan et al 2012 [ 16 ], Agarwal et al 2014 [ 1 ], Munjal et al 2015 [ 17 ], Dağkıran et al 2017 [ 18 ], Sengottuvelu et al 2017 [ 2 ], Bhagat et al 2018 [ 19 ], Elmoursy et al 2019 [ 20 ] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%