“…Subgroup Analysis. The sub-meta-analyses for both surgical insertion techniques cochleostomy and RW approach showed comparable results investigating nystagmography (cochleostomy: fixed effect model, OR of 0.22; 95% CI 0.09-0.54; P 5 0.0010 9,20,26,27,53,74,[81][82][83][84] and RW approach: random effects model, OR of 0.23; 95% CI 0.07-0.74; P 5 0.0136 15,20,52,75,79,81,85,86 ) and VEMPs (cochleostomy: fixed effect model; OR of 0.08; 95% CI 0.024-0.25; P 5 0.0001 9,12,32,74,78,80 and RW approach: fixed effect model, OR of 0.09; 95% CI 0.02-0.36; P 5 0.0008 8,15,52,75,79 ), compared to the whole meta-analyses with the complete data set. The OR and CI were essentially unaltered compared with the whole meta-analyses.…”