2012
DOI: 10.1029/2012gl053666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VHF lightning mapping observations of a triggered lightning flash

Abstract: [1] On 3 August 2010 an extensive lightning flash was triggered over Langmuir Laboratory in New Mexico. The upward positive leader propagated into the storm's midlevel negative charge region, extending over a horizontal area of 13 Â 13 km and 7.5 km altitude. The storm had a normalpolarity tripolar charge structure with upper positive charge over midlevel negative charge. Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) observations were used to estimate positive leader velocities along various branches, which were in the range … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14] and in Ref. [24], and also in observations with Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) (e.g., [5] and [3]). On the other hand, an unbranched upward positively charged leader that is initiated by a tall structure, and dies off without the ensuing dart leader to ground, exhibits the type of slowluminosity variation associated with changing ambient potential distribution in the cloud regions.…”
Section: Development Of Recoil Leadersmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[14] and in Ref. [24], and also in observations with Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) (e.g., [5] and [3]). On the other hand, an unbranched upward positively charged leader that is initiated by a tall structure, and dies off without the ensuing dart leader to ground, exhibits the type of slowluminosity variation associated with changing ambient potential distribution in the cloud regions.…”
Section: Development Of Recoil Leadersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the term "streamer" misrepresented the nature of the phenomenon, and has been replaced by the physically correct term "recoil leader," that matches all the attributes of K-changes [13]. A new term, recently introduced [3] for this phenomenon, is "retrograde leader," i.e., going backwards, which does not change or add anything to the meaning of the term "recoil leader," but, in the author's view, only contributes to the existing confusion in lightning terminology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In natural lightning, positive polarity breakdown usually radiates weakly at VHF and is often masked by stronger radiation from simultaneously occurring negative breakdown [e.g., Edens et al, 2012]. In natural lightning, positive polarity breakdown usually radiates weakly at VHF and is often masked by stronger radiation from simultaneously occurring negative breakdown [e.g., Edens et al, 2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37] Positive leaders themselves radiate very weakly in the VHF band, and their detection [Edens et al, 2012] depends on the proximity of at least five LMA sensors, low background noise levels, and absence of stronger emitting lightning sources such as negative leaders. As the LMA records only the highest received power in 80 μs bins, weaker sources will not be registered.…”
Section: Masking Of Positive Leaders and Retrograde (Recoil) Leadersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the term "recoil leader" is used frequently, the most fitting term is "retrograde negative leader" [Edens et al, 2012]. Observed with high-speed cameras, they look like luminous streaks occurring 3000-5000 times per second [Montanyà et al, 2012], revealing the locations of barely visible positive leader branches [Saba et al, 2008].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%