2003
DOI: 10.2307/3762043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viability and Maturation of Aphanomyces cochlioides Oospores

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 155.247.166.234 on Fri, 01 Jan 2016 07:14:02 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Mycologia, 95(2), 2003, pp. 321-326.Abstract: Plasmo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Viability was determined by inspection of approximately 300 oospores from each of three replicate plants. DOUG is an acronym for densely organized and uniformly granular organization of oosporic cytoplasm (Dyer & Windels, ). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… Viability was determined by inspection of approximately 300 oospores from each of three replicate plants. DOUG is an acronym for densely organized and uniformly granular organization of oosporic cytoplasm (Dyer & Windels, ). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For direct observation, three replicates of approximately 100 oospores from each isolate or cross of isolates were placed in slide wells in 30 μ L water. Oospores were counted and the number of oospores with cytoplasm showing densely organized uniform granules was recorded, as this morphology is correlated with viability in other oomycetes (Dyer & Windels, ) and often assumed to be an indication of viability (Tommerup et al ., ; Morgan, ; Fig. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second explanation involves inconsistencies associated with the MTT staining method that have already been noted (Etxeberria et al, ) suggesting that the evaluation of oospore quality may be subjective. Finally, to validate the virulence of these oospores, it would be necessary to have a correlation between visual tests and the ability of oospores to induce disease (Dyer & Windels, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissue from A. cochlioides oospores, mycelium, and infected sugar beet seedlings were collected, and RNA was extracted using a RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). Mycelium was grown as described above, and oospores were grown on 2-week old sugar beet hypocotyls using established methods (Dyer & Windels, 2003). Also, 2-week old sugar beet seedlings of cultivar Crystal 093 RR were soil-drip inoculated with 5,000 zoospores per plant following established protocols, and diseased roots were removed from pots at 1, 3, 5, and 10 days post inoculation (dpi) for RNA extraction (Windels & Brantner, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%