2024
DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00515-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viable tumor cell density after neoadjuvant chemotherapy assessed using deep learning model reflects the prognosis of osteosarcoma

Kengo Kawaguchi,
Kazuki Miyama,
Makoto Endo
et al.

Abstract: Prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for osteosarcoma is generally predicted using manual necrosis-rate assessments; however, necrosis rates obtained in these assessments are not reproducible and do not adequately reflect individual cell responses. We aimed to investigate whether viable tumor cell density assessed using a deep-learning model (DLM) reflects the prognosis of osteosarcoma. Seventy-one patients were included in this study. Initially, the DLM was trained to detect viable tumor cells, foll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of multiple integrated machine learning algorithms resulted in improved accuracy of prognostic predictions for osteosarcoma, as evidenced by higher concordance index scores compared to traditional methods. The experimental results are consistent with findings from other studies, which have used similar methodologies and analytical frameworks ( 47 50 ). OS samples from all datasets are classified by the OS-PCDS into high-risk and low-risk groups, with survival analysis indicating that a lower prognosis is associated with the low-risk group and a higher prognosis is associated with the high-risk group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The use of multiple integrated machine learning algorithms resulted in improved accuracy of prognostic predictions for osteosarcoma, as evidenced by higher concordance index scores compared to traditional methods. The experimental results are consistent with findings from other studies, which have used similar methodologies and analytical frameworks ( 47 50 ). OS samples from all datasets are classified by the OS-PCDS into high-risk and low-risk groups, with survival analysis indicating that a lower prognosis is associated with the low-risk group and a higher prognosis is associated with the high-risk group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%