2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2016.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration characteristics of golf club heads in their handheld grinding process and potential approaches for reducing the vibration exposure

Abstract: To control vibration-induced white finger among workers performing the fine grinding of golf club heads, the aims of this study are to clarify the major vibration sources in the grinding process, to identify and understand the basic characteristics of the club head vibration, and to propose potential approaches for reducing the vibration exposure. The vibrations on two typical club heads and two belt grinding machines were measured at a workplace. A simulated test station was also constructed and used to help … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 As a result, the major machine vibration components are correlated with the operation speed of the machine, which is usually at or above 1200 r/min or 20 Hz. 5 Therefore, besides controlling the unbalance of the rotating parts, the vibration exposure can be partially controlled by choosing appropriate operation speeds. Because the hand-arm system exhibits a major resonance in the range of 16-25 Hz, as shown in Figures 8 and 11, it may be useful to avoid the machine operation speeds near 20 Hz.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Study And Potential Topics For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 As a result, the major machine vibration components are correlated with the operation speed of the machine, which is usually at or above 1200 r/min or 20 Hz. 5 Therefore, besides controlling the unbalance of the rotating parts, the vibration exposure can be partially controlled by choosing appropriate operation speeds. Because the hand-arm system exhibits a major resonance in the range of 16-25 Hz, as shown in Figures 8 and 11, it may be useful to avoid the machine operation speeds near 20 Hz.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Study And Potential Topics For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4. Simulated grinding interfaces: (a) R1, R2, and R3 were cut from laboratory rubber materials and (b) R4, R5, and R6 were cut from factory grinding wheel treads obtained from a workplace 5. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We, together with our collaborators, have also conducted a series of investigations on handheld workpiece vibrations. First, we measured and characterized the vibration exposure of workers grinding typical handheld workpieces (golf club heads) at a workplace and preliminary strategies/methods for controlling the grinding vibration exposure were proposed [ 169 ]. Second, we measured vibration responses of the workpiece–hand–arm system in laboratory experiments [ 170 ], and developed a model of the system based on the measured response functions [ 78 ], as illustrated in Figure 6c .…”
Section: Intervention Methods and Technologies For Controlling Hand-transmitted Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have launched a systematic investigation to help control such vibration exposures. As the first step of the investigation, a series of experimental studies at a workplace were conducted to identify the basic vibration characteristics of the workpiece held in the worker's hands and pressed against a grinding wheel in order to shape the workpiece (Chen et al, 2017). In these studies, the vibrations from 6.3 to 1600 Hz in the one-third octave bands on workpieces and grinding machines were simultaneously measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%