2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration control of gyroelastic spacecraft using input shaping and angular momentum devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, a variety of open-loop and closed-loop control strategies have been proposed to reduce motion-induced vibration. Input shaping is one of the most popular and practical open-loop feedforward control strategies in reducing vibrations of flexible components of spacecraft [10,11] , flexible manipulators [12,13] . An input shaping approach modifies the reference signal for the system, such that it will avoid introducing unwanted oscillations in the system [14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, a variety of open-loop and closed-loop control strategies have been proposed to reduce motion-induced vibration. Input shaping is one of the most popular and practical open-loop feedforward control strategies in reducing vibrations of flexible components of spacecraft [10,11] , flexible manipulators [12,13] . An input shaping approach modifies the reference signal for the system, such that it will avoid introducing unwanted oscillations in the system [14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a large number of investigations toward feedback vibration control have also been conducted by using smart materials, like piezoelectric actuators, PVDF [21] . Furthermore, hybrid control strategies are also proposed to simultaneously realize motion control and vibration suppression [10,22,23] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of control techniques including the optimal Positive Position Feedback (PPF) control, simple adaptive control, input shaping combining classical control, LQR control, and sliding mode control have been used in the gyroelastic body by the researchers (E et al, 2020; Hu et al, 2013a; Jia and Shan, 2018a, 2018b, 2019). However, uncertainties due to change in system parameters with time and environmental factors are inevitable in the actual system (Fanson, 1987; Kumar, 2013; Youn et al, 2000), and none of these methods is suitable for the system with parametric uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive vibration isolation method has better high frequency vibration isolation capability, while active vibration isolation mainly has good suppression effect on low frequency vibration, including many methods, [9][10][11][12][13] such as PID control, adaptive control, component synthesis method, etc. Active-passive integrated vibration isolation method combines the advantages of the two and expands the vibration isolation bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%