2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2890024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration Detection of Spanning Subsea Pipelines by Using a Spherical Detector

Abstract: This paper proposes a method for detecting the vibration of subsea spanning pipelines by using a spherical detector (SD) equipped with a triaxial accelerometer. The mathematical analyses and experiments demonstrate that the acceleration modulus square (AMS) and the AMS of the ac components (AMS_AC) of the acceleration signals recorded by the SD have one characteristic component whose frequency is equal to and can be used to determine the pipeline vibration frequency. As the amplitude of this component is immun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method also has some drawbacks that are not related to spiral weld localization, but related to pipeline defect detection. The SD can only detect the existence of spiral weld and girth weld, as well as large deformation and vibration of pipeline [30][31][32], but cannot detect weld defects and local corrosion defects of pipe wall, especially the upper side, left side, and right side which are far away from the SD. This is because that the diameter of the SD is smaller than the diameter of the pipe, the SD cannot contact the pipe wall.…”
Section: Further Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method also has some drawbacks that are not related to spiral weld localization, but related to pipeline defect detection. The SD can only detect the existence of spiral weld and girth weld, as well as large deformation and vibration of pipeline [30][31][32], but cannot detect weld defects and local corrosion defects of pipe wall, especially the upper side, left side, and right side which are far away from the SD. This is because that the diameter of the SD is smaller than the diameter of the pipe, the SD cannot contact the pipe wall.…”
Section: Further Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SD has been used in the detection of magnetic anomalies in pipelines, and can identify girth welds from the measured magnetic signals, but cannot identify spiral welds [30]. Afterwards, the structure of SD was optimized to achieve fixed-axis rotation by adding a tungsten disc as counterweight to improve the quality of detected signals [31][32]. However, the existing SD is still unable to locate the crosspoint of spiral and girth welds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, pipeline trajectory measurements based on PIG and INS were only tested on pipelines no more longer than 2km [20]- [23]. INS based method is only applicable by PIGs that have high risk of blockage, but not suitable for the spherical detector (SD) [24]- [26] that has low risk of blockage and is capable of performing quasi real-time detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through simulations and many field experiments, the passing ability of the SD, especially the ability to pass through vertical pipes, has been adequately verified [21]. In addition, versatile pipeline detection applications, such as 3D pipeline localization [22], pipeline inflection point and magnetic anomaly detection [23], pipeline inclination measurement [24], and vibration detection [25] for spanning pipelines, have fully demonstrated the robust detection ability of SDs and their advantage of quasi real-time detection. Therefore, the SD shows promise in the field of subsea pipeline detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%