2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05483-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration hotspots reveal longitudinal funneling of sound-evoked motion in the mammalian cochlea

Abstract: The micromechanical mechanisms that underpin tuning and dynamic range compression in the mammalian inner ear are fundamental to hearing, but poorly understood. Here, we present new, high-resolution optical measurements that directly map sound-evoked vibrations on to anatomical structures in the intact, living gerbil cochlea. The largest vibrations occur in a tightly delineated hotspot centering near the interface between the Deiters’ and outer hair cells. Hotspot vibrations are less sharply tuned, but more non… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

24
135
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
24
135
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn 1, the compressive cochlear gain of OoC presented in a broader region more than a half octave below the BF at moderate stimuli intensities and more than one octave at high sound pressure level, i.e., 70 -80 dB SPL. This finding was consistent with the new data found in the mouse and gerbil reticular lamina and the BM vibrations (Cooper et al 2018;He et al 2018;Lee et al 2016;Ren et al 2016). This was likely because our measurements came from within the OoC near the top of the OHCs, the reticular lamina.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In turn 1, the compressive cochlear gain of OoC presented in a broader region more than a half octave below the BF at moderate stimuli intensities and more than one octave at high sound pressure level, i.e., 70 -80 dB SPL. This finding was consistent with the new data found in the mouse and gerbil reticular lamina and the BM vibrations (Cooper et al 2018;He et al 2018;Lee et al 2016;Ren et al 2016). This was likely because our measurements came from within the OoC near the top of the OHCs, the reticular lamina.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This nonlinear cochlear gain between 40 and 80 dB SPL was~23 dB at the BF. However, nonlinear gain was also found at frequencies down to 5 kHz with higher intensities, i.e., 70 -80 dB SPL, which was consistent with observations at the reticular lamina in the mouse and gerbil (Cooper et al 2018;He et al 2018;Lee et al 2016;Ren et al 2016). Finally, the phase demonstrated progressive lags with increasing frequency, which is consistent with traveling wave propagation.…”
Section: Abr Thresholds Remain Stable In This Animal Preparationsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The membrane model confirms the main predictions of the 1D model: A single mode of vibration of organ of Corti can be supported up to about 10 kHz but to cover the entire auditory range cannot be supported without multiple modes of motion in the cochlear partition [13]. This prediction appears consistent with recent observations with optical techniques in that the organ of Corti shows multiple modes of motion [44][45][46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This association reveals that there is more than one hyperpolarized state of the prestin sensor in the lateral membrane. Also relevant biologically is the speed of the conformational change of prestin, especially given the recent proposition that OHCs' electromotility may not be the only process responsible for amplifying sound in vivo (Cooper et al, 2018;Vavakou et al, 2019). Conventional models predict that the conformational change should proceed at reaction rates ≥70-90 kHz (time constant ≤2 μs at 37°C) to not limit hearing, while considering that nonecholocating mammals exhibit a median limit of 52 kHz, with a maximum limit of 70-90 kHz for mice (Heffner et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%