2016
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/25/11/115013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration monitoring via nano-composite piezoelectric foam bushings

Abstract: Most mechanical systems produce vibrations as an inherent side effect of operation. Though some vibrations are acceptable in operation, others can cause damage or signal a machine's imminent failure. These vibrations would optimally be monitored in real-time, without human supervision to prevent failure and excessive wear in machinery. This paper explores a new alternative to currently-used machine-monitoring equipment, namely a piezoelectric foam sensor system. These sensors are made of a silicone-based foam … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing this data from a mechanical perspective offers little to help identify the underlying drift mechanism. Though humidity is known to influence the mechanical response of viscoelastic polymers [37,38], it has been shown to soften polyurethane foam at higher levels (by 0.8%/%RH) [39,40], which should increase both peak strain (by 0.57%/%RH) and peak voltage per impact (by the same 0.57%/%RH, assuming a linear relationship between peak strain and peak voltage) [1]. It is likely that this mechanical effect causes minor drift in the response (in the opposite direction), but it only serves to slightly weaken the dominating electrical effect.…”
Section: Environmental Drift: Humiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Analyzing this data from a mechanical perspective offers little to help identify the underlying drift mechanism. Though humidity is known to influence the mechanical response of viscoelastic polymers [37,38], it has been shown to soften polyurethane foam at higher levels (by 0.8%/%RH) [39,40], which should increase both peak strain (by 0.57%/%RH) and peak voltage per impact (by the same 0.57%/%RH, assuming a linear relationship between peak strain and peak voltage) [1]. It is likely that this mechanical effect causes minor drift in the response (in the opposite direction), but it only serves to slightly weaken the dominating electrical effect.…”
Section: Environmental Drift: Humiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon deformation from impact, interactions between these additives and the surrounding foam matrix produce a distinct voltage response (figure 2). Previous work has determined this response to be related to the magnitude of impact applied to the sensor [1][2][3]. This quasi-piezoelectric effect can be harnessed to measure impact directly from a component that imparts energy-absorbing and cushioning properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nanocomposite piezoresponsive foam (NCPF) is a recently developed self-sensing material that produces a voltage during rapid deformation, and hence can be utilized to characterize impacts for applications such as helmets, sports padding, shoe insoles, and vibration-isolating components [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. However, there is currently no consensus on what specifically is being measured by a given foam sensor; i.e., what characteristic of the deformation (energy, impulse, velocity, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NCPF materials have been developed that undergo a constriction or expansion when a high voltage is applied [ 24 ]. The reverse effect—a charge arising from deformation—has only recently been discovered with nanocomposite foams that exhibit the quasi-piezoelectric (QPE) phenomenon during impact [ 1 , 2 ]. These NCPF materials have been tailored for use in a variety of applications including vibration monitoring [ 1 ], measuring ground reaction force in shoe insoles during running and walking [ 3 , 4 ], and detecting impact magnitude in football helmets [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%