1986
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1986)112:7(1692)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration of PC Bridge during Failure Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be noted that during test 34 a lower sweep rate was used with respect to the other linear sweeps hence a respectively lower value of frequency was estimated. The scarce influence of N on the modal frequencies in the cables is consistent with the findings of several experimental tests carried out on prestressed beams [1], [5], [10] and can be explained considering a very simple mechanical model of a supported beam of mass per unit length m, length L, subjected to a prestress force N. The n-th natural frequency of vibration is given by [11]: On the contrary, the values of the center-span deflection measured during this phase (T37, T45, T53 in Table 3) decrease linearly with the prestress force N, fitting very well the values given by the simple model of a beam on fix end supports under the dead load q and the tension N in the cables. It must be noted that the deflections during the tests were measured assuming as a reference configuration the one under the dead load q and the initial value of the prestress (N o =232kN): the center span deflection d max reported in Figure 4 is thus the decrease of the deflection due to the reduction of the prestress load, with respect to the reference value at mid span:…”
Section: Phase 1 Detensioning Of Bottom Cablessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It must be noted that during test 34 a lower sweep rate was used with respect to the other linear sweeps hence a respectively lower value of frequency was estimated. The scarce influence of N on the modal frequencies in the cables is consistent with the findings of several experimental tests carried out on prestressed beams [1], [5], [10] and can be explained considering a very simple mechanical model of a supported beam of mass per unit length m, length L, subjected to a prestress force N. The n-th natural frequency of vibration is given by [11]: On the contrary, the values of the center-span deflection measured during this phase (T37, T45, T53 in Table 3) decrease linearly with the prestress force N, fitting very well the values given by the simple model of a beam on fix end supports under the dead load q and the tension N in the cables. It must be noted that the deflections during the tests were measured assuming as a reference configuration the one under the dead load q and the initial value of the prestress (N o =232kN): the center span deflection d max reported in Figure 4 is thus the decrease of the deflection due to the reduction of the prestress load, with respect to the reference value at mid span:…”
Section: Phase 1 Detensioning Of Bottom Cablessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Access to strand anchorage and retensioning of strands is often difficult or even impossible hence the assessment of the structural performance is often carried out basing on indirect features recovered from vibrational response. Several studies focused on the use of dynamic parameters for damage identification in prestressed reinforced concrete beams have been presented in literature [1]- [7]. All the investigations show that the cracking of the concrete section leads to a global reduction of stiffness and to a local increase of curvature that can be reliably detected basing on the structural response to vibrations (provided the fault induces measurable variations of these features).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these tests sinusoidal excitation was applied with an electro-hydraulic actuator. Kato and Shimada (1986) performed ambient vibration measurements on an existing prestressed concrete bridge during a test to failure. A reduction in natural frequencies could be detected as a statically applied load approached the ultimate load.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the 1980s initiated the investigation of metal and composite beams [14][15][16][17], bridges [18][19][20], the space shuttle [21][22][23], and nuclear plants [24]. Additional damage detection research originating in the late 1980s and the 1990s involved trusses [25][26][27], plates [28][29][30][31][32], buildings [33,34], concrete beams [35,36], shells and frames [37][38][39], horizontal axis wind turbine blades [40], and aircraft structures [41].…”
Section: Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%