2021
DOI: 10.1177/1077546320984305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration suppression of structures using tuned mass damper technology: A state-of-the-art review

Abstract: To date, considerable attention has been paid to the development of structural vibration suppression techniques. Among all vibration suppression devices and techniques, the tuned mass damper is one of the most promising technologies due to its mechanical simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and reliable operation. In this article, a critical review of the structural vibration suppression using tuned mass damper technology will be presented mainly focused on the following four categories: (1) tuned mass damper techn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 222 publications
(342 reference statements)
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal performance of the proposed flexible vibration absorber occurs when the complete system describes dominantly linear behavior around its nominal operating conditions or maximal allowable deflections. This assumption was established in Equation (12), which implies the application of a linear operator; in this specific case, the Laplace transform. Even though the absorber had a nonlinear model, it was considered to behave as a linear system in spite of the nonlinear phenomena as established in Equations ( 8) and (9).…”
Section: Quantification and Detection Of Nonlinear Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal performance of the proposed flexible vibration absorber occurs when the complete system describes dominantly linear behavior around its nominal operating conditions or maximal allowable deflections. This assumption was established in Equation (12), which implies the application of a linear operator; in this specific case, the Laplace transform. Even though the absorber had a nonlinear model, it was considered to behave as a linear system in spite of the nonlinear phenomena as established in Equations ( 8) and (9).…”
Section: Quantification and Detection Of Nonlinear Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In structural engineering, the most widely used application of a passive vibration absorption scheme is the attenuation of the dynamic response for a building structure, where the high-percentage attenuation of the amplitude of vibration in the main system can be achieved by using a TMD in mass-spring damper or pendulum configurations [11][12][13]. In this context, several works have been developed from a theoretical and experimental point of view, mainly to attenuate the oscillations of the host structure because of seismic and wind-induced loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the two main optimization approaches commonly adopted in the optimal design of the classical TMD or its modifications are: (i) the gradient based optimization method, such as Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) quasi-Newton method; and (ii) the global optimization methods such as particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms [29].…”
Section: Optimum Design Of the Control Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of studies have been conducted to optimise the design parameters, and hence maximise the performance of vibration absorbers. Although the design concept of a TMD was developed decades ago, its simplicity and effectiveness have made it one of the most popular passive vibration methods to suppress structural vibration [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the vast majority of papers, the structure-absorber system is still treated as a system with two degrees of freedom (2DOF). The optimal design of an absorber is not a new topic, and the optimal methodologies and parameters of the optimal DVA or TMD system for SDOF main structures subjected to different loading conditions have been verified by several researchers since the 1960s [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%