1991
DOI: 10.1080/02533839.1991.9677366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration tests and damage detection of P/C bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, noninvasive testing of a structure can be carried out by ascertaining changes in dynamic properties. For example, research on continuous beams conducted by Tang and Leu (1991) revealed that for the detection of damaged locations, changes in mode are more sensitive than changes in natural frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, noninvasive testing of a structure can be carried out by ascertaining changes in dynamic properties. For example, research on continuous beams conducted by Tang and Leu (1991) revealed that for the detection of damaged locations, changes in mode are more sensitive than changes in natural frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jain concluded that modal parameters, particularly frequencies and mode shapes, can furnish only general information on the damage state of the structure: deviation in these parameters indicates that damage has occurred, but not its local extent or underlying cause. Tang and Leu (1991) performed experiments on a defective prestressed concrete girder bridge. They found that mode shape changes may be a more effective indicator for damage detection in bridges than frequency shifts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many nondestructive techniques using different tools such as vision, optical radiography, ultrasonic, acoustic emission, dynamic properties, magnetic particles, eddy current, microwave, thermal and so on [16][17][18]. Visual inspection is the oldest and most relied upon method for bridge inspection.…”
Section: Damage Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%