1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.58.14442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibrational dynamics in solid α-oxygen: Experimental assessment of spin-phonon couplings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculated contributions of magnons (see Fig. 6 in [21]) should appear at E≃5 meV and E≃12.5 meV, which are neither detected in our or their data. The magnon peak positions at lower energies are explained by de Bernabe et al by a decrease of the exchange constant (see Eq.…”
contrasting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Calculated contributions of magnons (see Fig. 6 in [21]) should appear at E≃5 meV and E≃12.5 meV, which are neither detected in our or their data. The magnon peak positions at lower energies are explained by de Bernabe et al by a decrease of the exchange constant (see Eq.…”
contrasting
confidence: 87%
“…Their results show a mixture of phonons, librons and anti-ferromagnetic excitations (magnons). The peak at E≃10.5 meV at T=5 K in our result is more pro- 6) in [21]) with decreasing temperature. A more general detailed analysis of our neutron scattering data will be presented in a forthcoming paper.…”
supporting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Magnetic correlations are of a predominant antiferromagnetic character and dominated by nearest neighbors separated by 3.37 Å. Such a value of eff is, however, well above that determined from neutron diffraction 10 for the magnetically ordered ␣ phase at low temperatures corresponding to eff = 1.45 B .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…(The behavior of interplane deformation u zz will be discussed in the next section). The values of phenomenological constants derived from fitting of functions η(T, P ), ∆s/s(T, P ) to experimental data 9,10 with due account of M 0 (T ) temperature dependence 11,12 are given in Table I. It can be seen from the Table I that K eff = K 0 − K 4 + Λ (α) M 2 0 and K 4 are comparable in order of value with the shear modulus of the material 13 .…”
Section: Temperature/pressure Dependence Of Lattice Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%