2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.theochem.2004.09.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibrational frequencies and structural determination of norbornadiene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that DGauss was itself part of Unichem, a now obsolete suite of computational quantum-chemistry programs written for (exceedingly fast) calculations on large pharmaceutical compounds, at the cost in DFT of a prune integration grid of much lower quality than with Gaussian, which by default consists of 1100 points only per atom . The BP/TZVP analysis which Mackenzie-Ross et al made of the IR and Raman vibrational spectra of norbornadiene also indicates that geometry was optimized regardless of the C 2 v symmetry point group, considering that several calculated frequencies were left without any proper symmetry label, and that most formally IR-inactive A 2 modes were ascribed some intensity, regardless of dipole selection rules in IR spectroscopy (see Table 4 in ref and compare it with the work by Jensen in ref for an assignment of the vibrational spectra of norbornadiene upon a properly optimized C 2 v geometry). A lack of control upon the symmetry characteristics of orbitals combined with errors in numerical integrations at large values of r may very well explain the too strong turn-ups and numerous oscillations that were theoretically predicted for several momentum profiles (Figure b−d) by Mackenzie-Ross et al at low electron momenta ( p < 0.25 au), apparently and strangely enough in excellent agreement with experiment. , In support of the assertion that many turn-ups at p → 0 in the theoretical momentum distributions by Mackenzie-Ross et al are numerical artifacts, note that, unlike DFT calculations, HF and ADC(3) calculations employing as here Gaussian-type AO basis sets are not subject to numerical integration problems, since all required one- and two-electron integrals are evaluated analytically.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Note that DGauss was itself part of Unichem, a now obsolete suite of computational quantum-chemistry programs written for (exceedingly fast) calculations on large pharmaceutical compounds, at the cost in DFT of a prune integration grid of much lower quality than with Gaussian, which by default consists of 1100 points only per atom . The BP/TZVP analysis which Mackenzie-Ross et al made of the IR and Raman vibrational spectra of norbornadiene also indicates that geometry was optimized regardless of the C 2 v symmetry point group, considering that several calculated frequencies were left without any proper symmetry label, and that most formally IR-inactive A 2 modes were ascribed some intensity, regardless of dipole selection rules in IR spectroscopy (see Table 4 in ref and compare it with the work by Jensen in ref for an assignment of the vibrational spectra of norbornadiene upon a properly optimized C 2 v geometry). A lack of control upon the symmetry characteristics of orbitals combined with errors in numerical integrations at large values of r may very well explain the too strong turn-ups and numerous oscillations that were theoretically predicted for several momentum profiles (Figure b−d) by Mackenzie-Ross et al at low electron momenta ( p < 0.25 au), apparently and strangely enough in excellent agreement with experiment. , In support of the assertion that many turn-ups at p → 0 in the theoretical momentum distributions by Mackenzie-Ross et al are numerical artifacts, note that, unlike DFT calculations, HF and ADC(3) calculations employing as here Gaussian-type AO basis sets are not subject to numerical integration problems, since all required one- and two-electron integrals are evaluated analytically.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As an example, dipolar coupling values, vibrational harmonic corrections obtained by using experimental frequencies, and R values, together with other useful information, are reported in Table for a single temperature corresponding to T red = 0.94. The same data for all the temperatures are reported in Tables SI-2, SI-3, and SI-4 of the Supporting Information, respectively, for the solute in EBBA, MM, and ZLI1132.…”
Section: Determination Of Ndbs Geometry and Order Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Recently, Jensen theoretically determined the structure of NBD and assigned its vibrational frequencies. 24 However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has thus far investigated the thermal dimerization reaction for NBD in the gas phase. Of these NBD dimers, like ethylene, the cyclobutane dimers should be considered as the products of the [212] cycloaddition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%