“…The dielectric friction can be modeled using continuum theories of NeeZwanzig (NZ) (Nee and Zwanzig, 1970), which treats the solute as a point dipole rotating in a spherical cavity, Alavi-Waldeck (AW) (Alavi and Waldeck, 1991b;1993) model which is an extension of the NZ theory where the solute is treated as a distribution of charges instead of point dipole and the semiempirical approach of van der Zwan and Hynes (vdZH) (van der Zwan and Hynes, 1985) in which fluorescence Stokes shift of the solute in a given solvent is related to dielectric friction. Conversely, the results of neutral and nonpolar solutes deviate significantly from the hydrodynamic predictions at higher viscosities (Waldeck et al, 1982;Canonica et al, 1985;Phillips et al, 1985;Courtney et al, 1986;Ben Amotz and Drake, 1988;Roy and Doraiswamy, 1993;Williams et al, 1994;Jiang and Blanchard, 1994;Anderton and Kauffman, 1994;Brocklehurst and Young, 1995;Benzler and Luther, 1997;Dutt et al, 1999;Ito et al, 2000;Inamdar et al, 2006). These probes rotate much faster than predicted by the SED theory with stick boundary condition and are described by either slip boundary condition or by quasihydrodynamic theories.…”